Jump to content

For Questions Regarding WOFs/CERTs/NUMBER PLATEs


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 9.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

My l200 has been fed by an external pump since 2001, can't say I have ever noticed it surging.

Once I ran it empty and had to rock it back and forward to get fuel in the lines so I could drive 100m to the petrol pump, was driving normal till then lol

Posted

I welded a drop box on the bottom of my Datsun 1200 coupe tank for efi.  Good thing, zero surge, bad is it holds maybe 1.2l, and when it runs out you get one cough, then 100m you are on side of the road.  

  • Like 1
Posted
10 hours ago, R3spct said:

I welded a drop box on the bottom of my Datsun 1200 coupe tank for efi.  Good thing, zero surge, bad is it holds maybe 1.2l, and when it runs out you get one cough, then 100m you are on side of the road.  

I'm going to do a similar thing on my Valiant. Not because of EFI. (Not at this stage anyway) But because the fuel tank is relatively small. (68 ish litres) and the factory pick up sees the engine stop dead when there's still a few litres of gas in the tank. 

I'm going to run a dry sump fitting (which has a mesh cone as part of it) 

The biggest ball ache was having to make a 5/16 hose tail, because nobody makes a fitting with that big of a step down.  (The rest is dash 10 or 12, I forget which)  just gonna use a bit of 3" or 4"  exhaust tube. 

It also won't be hard to change the hose tail to 3/8 if anyone ever upgrades the fuel lines under the car. 

20250130_053406.jpg

Posted

why not just upgrade the rest of the line to a reasonable size instead of the ballache of making that fitting and be better all round?

Posted

Because they don't make a dash 12 to 3/8 hose tail either. 

And replacing the whole hardline under a car is an absolute cunt of a job.  Buying two parts and getting a friend to glue them together was eleventy billion times less fuck around..........

And I'm not at a power level (yet) where it needs to be upgraded.

  • Like 3
Posted

If a fella had aftermarket alloy wheels on his car and they had 'competition use only' cast into them would this prove problematic come lvvt cert time?

*asking for a friend*

Posted

Possibly. 

Depends what they are.

For example, 14x8 tridens have some words on the back of them, off toad use only or something like that, because at the time 8inch wheels were not legal in Australia. 

Then there's some skinny drag wheels that say they are for race use only because they fall to bits if you go around a corner 

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, cletus said:

Possibly. 

Depends what they are.

For example, 14x8 tridens have some words on the back of them, off toad use only or something like that, because at the time 8inch wheels were not legal in Australia. 

Then there's some skinny drag wheels that say they are for race use only because they fall to bits if you go around a corner 

 

Welded 3 piece 14x6.5 & 7.5 Hayashi

Posted

20250205_183520.thumb.jpg.eeb214a6ada03720328c275bd378b14c.jpg

Ok gents, these seat adaptors...

Current gameplan is to mount the 10mm packer to the 5mm plate with m8 countersunk screws, screws will be shortened etc etc.

The O.E rails to be attached to the packer using m8 capscrews in the original rail holes.

And the seat to be attached to the 5mm plate via the seats 8mm studs and nuts.

Sound legit?

  • Like 1
Posted

I suppose your design will be up to your certifier (I like it). I have been told I need to have at least three threads protruding through the other side. So you can't shorten them flush. Not sure what the three threads protruding do though. With sliding parts hopefully that's not a problem for you.

Posted

Hmm 3 thread protusion would stop the rail from sitting flat onto the adaptor... would hope as all threads are cut into the 10mm thick section it will be ok. But common sense and nzta don't really go together.

Posted

The threads protruding thing comes from the CCM chapter 18

That says that a bolt must protrude past a lock nut by 2 threads

The reason for this is the first thread on a bolt is a bit smaller, so a nyloc or similar lock nut will not grip the threads correctly if it's flush.

Unfortunately some of the requirements in the book don't fit every situation,  and sometimes are misinterpreted or applied where they don't need to be

Personally I would not require 2 threads past the face of a threaded part, as long as there's enough thread engagement in the part itself 

 

 

 

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 2
Posted

Ahh that makes sense, downloaded the ccm last week but haven't gone through it yet.

Figured no point looking at the old ringbinder one in the shed. 

The local cert guy is about 10 minutes away but is hard to get hold of. So i appreciate all your input @cletus and team.

  • Like 1
Posted

talking to an old boy about my rx7 and mentioned the roll cage in it and that I had considered removing it at one stage 

He said 'oh you probably don't want to do that' - he reckoned when the side impact rules came in in the 90s, importers found it cheaper to import a car "for race use only" to circumvent the side impact requirements, then fit a cheap half cage, THEN recertify for the road where the cage trumped the lack of side bars 

True or BS? 

  • Haha 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...