Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Yeah with hindsight one of the mistakes that I made was using red paint on the mould (figured it would help show where it needs sanding etc) 
Now I've got tiny red bits stuck here and there ,and it sticks out heaps.
If it was black instead you wouldnt even see them.
Ahh well!
Know for next time haha. 

 

  • Like 5
Posted

Few anorak questions here, regular spray gloss spray paint for the mould? And what resin/Epoxy are you using for the carbon fibre?

Love the result too! Will look amazing when shined up a bit :smile:

  • Like 1
Posted

Just used some regular spray can paint that I had laying around. 
I dont think the paint or surface finish is so important though, so long as it's smooth.
 @flyingbrick was saying you can use polished up bog as a reliable surface.

Important part is the release wax, use a meguires release wax that you buff into it a few times over, stops a chemical bond of the epoxy to the mould. 
Then some people put the PVA release stuff on it too. 

But you can still mechanically lock your part in place if you havent allowed enough draft angle to let the part pop off. 

Using an Adhesive Technologies epoxy, as it's rated for high temp as I originally bought it to make an intake manifold that would bolt directly to the head.


 

  • Like 2
Posted

Yeah I don't think you are waxing quite enough, and pva is a huge safety net. It's biggest pro is that it dissolves in water so I'd your wax ain't good enough and your parts still stuck- you just soak the whole lot in water till it pops free.

 

  • Like 7
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Have you got a side shot showing where the throttles sit in relation to the new rad support?

That mondeo setup looks like it might work, maybe with the filter tipped onto more of an angle than you have it now??

 

image.thumb.png.e23400ee3066646884c8f655e7dc73c9.png

  • Like 4
Posted
18 hours ago, xsspeed said:

lush, did you snap pics of all the cars too? would be cool to associate engine bay to particular gen/class of touring car

Na was way to hot for my brain to think of smart things like that!

Posted

All good, keen to see in that engine bay of the CET p10 primera Steven Richards peddled, I see the P11 has a flipped head as per most of the later 90s touring cars

Sorry for touring car chat invading your thread romandayf

I did like the Volvo, I think it was, that was also using the same location either side of main intake to take ducts down, presumably to other oil/water coolers/brakes

Who was talking about low intakes? Speeno? All of these seem to sit high

Posted
18 hours ago, xsspeed said:

All good, keen to see in that engine bay of the CET p10 primera Steven Richards peddled, I see the P11 has a flipped head as per most of the later 90s touring cars

Sorry for touring car chat invading your thread romandayf

I did like the Volvo, I think it was, that was also using the same location either side of main intake to take ducts down, presumably to other oil/water coolers/brakes

Who was talking about low intakes? Speeno? All of these seem to sit high

Essentially, it's identical arrangement in that P10 vs the 98 P11.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
18 hours ago, xsspeed said:

Who was talking about low intakes? Speeno? All of these seem to sit high

The early cars hard normal heads and big duct work around the front to pickup behind the grill. Then the middle era cars had intakes at the front, usually a pickup behind the grill. Some of the last cars had the intake tied into the air feed from the bumper with full front end carbon ducting, just speculating that it is probably better airflow down that way or just packaging it all into the front aero who knows. Then kinda backhand suggesting that roman needs to move his engine back 30-40cm and flip the axles out the front so he can fit the outboard injection and the filter in nicely.

Renault and honda below.

image.png.77a79fbed07bd2ac92daf8c62a783fed.png

image.png.d3d609a57a47965620fb5970c9043dae.png

 

  • Like 6
  • Thanks 2
Posted

I think its easier for those cars as the engines are solid mounted. It's having to account for engine moving, and the limited front space that makes life tricky. 

 

Posted

image.png

I am curious (because i have limited materials knowledge) as to how they choose aramid fibre over carbon fibre when manufacturing this duct work. There has to be more to their thinking than simply wanting to add some color contrast to the otherwise black and blue engine bay.

Posted

Unsure about the properties of both materials, but is one of them more flexible than the other?

In that car (1997 Laguna, that's my shot), the radiators and ducting is mounted to a floating "subframe" arrangement hung off little dampers, it also retains the splitter and the undertray. Idea is you run super slammed and it just moves when you strike a ripple strip/curbing on track. Unsure if there is any strength or cost differential between them, but a quick Google suggests the aramid fibre is much less brittle than carbon so it could have a bearing on why those particular components are made out of the stuff?

  • Like 5

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...