Roman

Members
  • Content Count

    4,397
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

Roman last won the day on March 14 2018

Roman had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

9,919 Excellent

About Roman

  • Rank
    RHS Master

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling

Converted

  • Local Area
    Auckland

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Roman

    Arduino stuff/ programing/so cheap

    Something else ive figured out recently while trying to make a trip meter. I got caught up thinking that to convert hours into a smaller number you need to go minutes then seconds... but this is a problem because you need to divide by 60 so you get a remainder on your number that gets wiped so its less accurate when you're dicing up 50kph into 10hz snippets (or whatever) Instead of that. Figured out i could just use interrupts at 1000th of an hour (or whatever) so the value you end up with is only ever divided or multiplied by 10. So for example 50kph you might set your interrupt frequency so you get a number back saying you travelled 50cm in that time. Makes the maths super easy! Kinda like a metric version of time keeping haha.
  2. Roman

    Arduino stuff/ programing/so cheap

    One thing which has been a ball buster until i realised why. Any program that scans the com ports looking for a device fucks with any others doing the same. If i have arduino ide open i cant connect on pclink. And vice versa. Took a while to figure that out...
  3. Roman

    DIY Fuel injection thread.

    It might help to set the arming threshold/voltage for your VR a bit higher if there's a table for that in your ECU
  4. Roman

    DIY Fuel injection thread.

    So I got a new wideband and setup the fuel nicely for the new cam angles, and went for a bit of a drive out of town. I also had my new dash setup with a realtime economy gauge so you could see what's happening and adjust your behaviour to suit. Results from a ~2 hour drive from Auckland to Morrinsville: Pretty stoked with that! One of my goals has been to get it into the 6l/100 range but I thought I'd need the dual VVTI engine and the revised 6th gear ratio to acheive that. The mean cam angle value for the trip was just a shade under 20 degrees, when it was previously around 10. It's hard to say whether improvements came down to having the economy gauge of the cam angle changes but good results. So either way thats a win. Felt nice to drive in any case. Having that realtime gauge was great though, in some situations where you think you're better off going straight to 6th to keep the revs low you cut the fuel consumption in half by staying in 4th or whatever. Other situations the opposite. Seemed really counter intuitive but I think that'll stay on my dash screen for sure! One suprise is that the car is actually quite economical just trundling around the 50kph mark.
  5. You need to run the voltage sense wire all the way on its own to the battery. Or otherwise diagnose it further. Buying a new battery isnt the fix here.
  6. You're just being provocative, you know damn bloody well that half the forum here is named Dave
  7. Question re: pedal boxes. I had a bit of a manlook but couldnt find any threads about it. What's legal or not legal? I think I remember seeing something about not being allowed to weld the pedals or they have to be all one piece. But what other rules are there around what you can/cant do, and what materials can be used and so on? I had a look through the cert manual thing about rules for brakes but couldnt find any specific info about pedal box construction.
  8. Roman

    DIY Fuel injection thread.

    Okay I think looking at the data in megalog viewer gives some more sane results / actual labelled axes etc If we look at the cam timing angles which give the maximum vacuum then the results sanity check quite well against my full throttle cam timing. If you aim for minimum vacuum then it basically just says bang in 50 deg advance everywhere haha. So this is ramping up my cam advance much more aggressively than before but it's settling on around 20-30 degrees at 30% throttle which seems reasonable. It also sanity checks against the toyota documentation where it says "advance cam about half way" for medium load conditions. Will have to take it for some nangs though and see what its like now / maybe do same thing again at a few more throttle iterations. If this works well then I'll have a MAFless method for doing the same with quad throttles which is excellent news!
  9. Roman

    DIY Fuel injection thread.

    Doing the test again at 10% throttle was pretty painful haha. But some graphs from each rpm range. The horizontal scale is cam advance degrees and the vertical scale is map pressure drop from atmospheric (divided by 2) Conclusion: No idea to be honest. The MAF reading seems to be much more resilient to cam timing changes than expected. MAP is swinging around all over the show but it seems to cause very little resistance to fresh air coming in. Which maybe makes sense. I can say this though, once I got to around 40 degrees advance the car felt like it lost heaps of power.... Took a long time to get to 60kph in third haha. So perhaps that is the EGR effect at work. Probably needs heaps more ignition timing. Ultimately though this hasnt shown me anything as insightful as I was hoping and I'm not sure what the conclusion is here. Thanks for reading / sorry for pointless post / etc
  10. Roman

    DIY Fuel injection thread.

    Yes so this is why part throttle stuff is so complex/interesting. As you say, what is the point of part throttle... You're obviously not trying to make max power or max airflow. So yes for me economy is the primary consideration, but also trying to get a good understanding of why things are beneficial while I've still got a good suite of sensors attached. As I want to come up with a good methodology for finding best cam angle when only MAP or TPS available as a reliable load axis. (ie quads) At the moment I can observe the effects and see why changes are beneficial but I honestly have no idea exactly why they are. Seeing the map signal change how it does in relation to MAF was an interesting thing. Sooooo I think I've found what I'm after. It only happens in the higher rpm of my test because 30% throttle doesnt pull enough vaccum to make it happen at lower rpm. But generally you see the MAF signal increase as the manifold pressure goes down because of increased VE. Buuutttt when intake manifold pressure gets low enough and there is enough overlap you start getting exhaust gas pulled back into the cylinder. When this happens map signal goes up and maf signal goes down. You can see here it only starts to happen right at 45+ degrees cam advance, the trend reverses: (Sorry havent labelled axes cos I'm a cretin but that's cam advance on horizontal and arbitrary rescaled numbers on the vertical) I think the 45 deg mark is the critical point where you start getting EGR effect happening. So thats whats relevant for economy, finding that point at each load/rpm combo. So I would expect if I run this test again at lower rpm with the same vacuum level I will start to see those converging lines start to happen at a much lower cam advance angle. As at half the rpm you have twice as long for a given amount of overlap to start pulling air back in from the exhaust. These tests even at 5500rpm are still at 75kpa give or take, so not much vacuum generated! Will try again later tonight and try get some ~2500ish rpm results at maybe 40-50kpa hopefully. I think when I swap to a dual VVTI engine and can adjust the exhaust side too. You will be able to make convergence happen sooner without the VE increase that comes from advancing intake cam. So can set the intake cam angle for worst VE / best pumping losses and exhaust cam for best EGR effect. I hope it works out as clearly as it seems it might!
  11. Roman

    DIY Fuel injection thread.

    Sooooooooo my favourite mystery topic. Part throttle Variable cam tuning. I did some tests tonight to try find out what cam angle might be "best" at a given throttle angle. By best I mean max airflow as read by the MAF. I used E-throttle to limit throttle angle to 30% max and did some pulls through the rev range, logging the MAF and MAP values as I increment through the intake cam angles in 5 degree steps. As expected, both the MAF and MAP values change as you advance the cam. But what was interesting is that there is loosely a correlation between achieving the strongest vacuum, and highest MAF reading. At 4000rpm with 0 degrees cam advance we are losing 11kpa and have 0.406 grams per cyl. At 45 degrees advance we are losing 16kpa and have 0.488 grams per cylinder of airflow. So 45% more vaccum and 20% more airflow. At 5000rpm with 0 degrees cam advance we are losing 20kpa and have 0.416 grams per cylinder. With 35 degrees cam advance we are losing 24kpa and have 0.456 grams per cylinder. 20% more vacuum and 9% more air. So whats interesting about this is you dont always have a MAF available for cam angle tuning but it loosely correlates to MAP. As a general rule from my testing it seems if you can get 10% more vacuum you'll get 5% more airflow. Similar to ignition timing though it looks like it ramps up quickly to best values then plateaus over a cam timing spread. I'll post something better later on once I've had a chance at figuring out how to format this mess of data. But seems like there's a fairly clear correlation which makes sense, if you are improving VE via cam timing then you are increasing the air demand... which the throttle restricts hence extra vacuum. I'll do some more tests at lower throttle with higher vacuum too and see if I'm getting similar results. Something else thats really interesting is that the best cam angle settings even at this low throttle angle are much higher than I would have expected. Based on absolutely no evidence I've just been slowly ramping the timing down towards zero throttle. It looks like past maybe 10-15% throttle it's just going to be the cam in a position very close to WOT for max airflow. It will be interesting to see if we see the same trends with much stronger vacuum. Will do some more tests through the week!
  12. Roman

    kpr's starlet

    What an awesome run that motor has had! RIP in peace old chap
  13. Roman

    Vintage Grumbles AE86

    Some of you guys are being a bit harsh. His AE101 FXGT looks pretty good I reckon
  14. Roman

    Rules for PCV/Rocker Cover Vents

    Part of what's good about having a PCV system with 2 lines is that it works two different ways. When you are at full throttle, it blows the crank case fumes out into the line without the PCV valve ahead of the intake. Which then gets sucked back into the intake and combusted. Then when you are at low throttle the PCV valve sucks fumes into the intake with the intake vacuum, which then pulls fresh air the other way through the crank case via the 2nd hose so you are getting active circulation. (assuming it's drawing more air through the valve than your pistons blowby... ha) If you just dump both lines into a catch can then the only air that circulates through your crank case is combustion gas leaking past piston rings. How much difference this makes in the short term is probably sweet F all. Maybe just need more regular oil changes or something. Dont know. But its worth considering why there are two lines there in the first place before removing them. As Cletus has mentioned though, dont underestimate how much it sucks having a stinky fumey car. Wears thin pretty quick.
  15. Roman

    Romans COD piece

    Paint 3D dont you dare utter those words around here Blasphemy! I'm still a bit mad about the anti aliasing they've added TBH