Corbie Posted April 30, 2015 Share Posted April 30, 2015 Russell? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MRWEST Posted April 30, 2015 Share Posted April 30, 2015 Prob been answered before but i cant rememeber the answer, Rules/max size for spacers (from memory must have 6 x turns on wheel nuts?) Truspokes dont clear disks on front slightly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoKer Posted May 1, 2015 Share Posted May 1, 2015 is this for real/should we share it about Clint? John BrettAnyone who has tried to get a LVV Cert will know the problems of dealing with the LVVTA. As en ex LVV Certifier who has enjoyed Certing many subs, and takes issue with the LVVTA Hot rod focus, I have created a survey. We have a meeting with NZTA NEXT WEDNESDAY, and we want to take along your responses to improve the system! https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/7H8VXC2 was posted on my other favorite car forums page more : http://lowvolumevehicle.co.nz/2015/04/nzta-clearly-does-not-have-very-high-standards/ alot of hot air or something the "We" (as car enthusiasts) should be concerned with remove if spam/not public material Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joel Posted May 1, 2015 Share Posted May 1, 2015 I'm interested in routing my exhaust exit to the side of the car (circled below) and I have read up that the exhausts cannot sit directly below a passenger compartment, I assume where I want it is fine, but I don't know what the limit to how far it can protrude from the body is. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cletus Posted May 1, 2015 Share Posted May 1, 2015 Prob been answered before but i cant rememeber the answer, Rules/max size for spacers (from memory must have 6 x turns on wheel nuts?) Truspokes dont clear disks on front slightly //oldschool.co.nz/index.php?/topic/46520-wheel-adaptors-and-spacers/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post cletus Posted May 1, 2015 Popular Post Share Posted May 1, 2015 is this for real/should we share it about Clint? was posted on my other favorite car forums page more : http://lowvolumevehicle.co.nz/2015/04/nzta-clearly-does-not-have-very-high-standards/ alot of hot air or something the "We" (as car enthusiasts) should be concerned with remove if spam/not public material i hope not. bear in mind that website is run by someone who used to be a certifier but got kicked out for consistently poor certification decisions, then appealed the decision in court, and lost again. he was well known for doing stupid things like posting videos of himself doing a 100kph brake test in an 80k area, another one was of him doing a brake test on a motorway onramp i remember him asking in a training session what an external wastegate was for and why they were so noisy. the only thing that concerns me is there is a lot of negative focus on LVVTA at the moment for a number of reasons, and setting up a survey where the outcome may not be good given the current situation, could result in losing the system we have, and end up with something a lot worse. 13 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cletus Posted May 1, 2015 Share Posted May 1, 2015 I'm interested in routing my exhaust exit to the side of the car (circled below) and I have read up that the exhausts cannot sit directly below a passenger compartment, I assume where I want it is fine, but I don't know what the limit to how far it can protrude from the body is. 2.1 (4) in here http://www.lvvta.org.nz/documents/standards/LVVTA_STD_Exhaust_Noise_Emissions.pdf Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mof Posted May 1, 2015 Share Posted May 1, 2015 As I am also interested in the answer to this question, ( B ) terminates in a position where the outer end of the exhaust pipe is not directly underneath the passenger compartment. So the passenger compartment includes the rear part of the softtop? If so, he can't put it there? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cletus Posted May 1, 2015 Share Posted May 1, 2015 if it exits at the side ie level with the side of the body, then it is not under it, therefore ok Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mof Posted May 1, 2015 Share Posted May 1, 2015 Oh yeah, I actually clicked just before, they mean under the cabin duh me 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joel Posted May 1, 2015 Share Posted May 1, 2015 if it exits at the side ie level with the side of the body, then it is not under it, therefore ok Thanks for clarification 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flyingbrick Posted May 1, 2015 Share Posted May 1, 2015 I think we should all try search before asking repeat questions. Poor Clint Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kris Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 HI All, hopefully not a repeat question - I've read the last 100 pages of this thread and not found an answer. If a car has been on reg hold for say 10 years. Is it best to get it back on the road unmodified, register it, wof it, and then do the mods. Or just mod and cert. Obviously the former is easier as you can test it on the road etc. But, from the certification point of view - any advantages either way? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
japawagons Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 If the rego is still live. I.e you could just take it for a WOF inspection and if it passes register it. Then I would just modify it and get a LVV Cert completed. Its irrelevant how long its been in unwarranted. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNAMUCK Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 Get all the shit ready to modify it, then get a wof while stock. Then try get it modified to fuck before the wof runs out. That's what I'd do. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cletus Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 HI All, hopefully not a repeat question - I've read the last 100 pages of this thread and not found an answer. If a car has been on reg hold for say 10 years. Is it best to get it back on the road unmodified, register it, wof it, and then do the mods. Or just mod and cert. Obviously the former is easier as you can test it on the road etc. But, from the certification point of view - any advantages either way? id just do what i want to it then cert then wof. that way you may save time and money by not getting it to wof standard then redo work to do the mods. if you are doing it properly then getting a wof wont be an issue with it modified anyway Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kdotlowe Posted May 3, 2015 Share Posted May 3, 2015 This has probably been asked 1000 times, but I can't seem to find anything recent after a quick search In the process of dropping a 1.8T engine from a MK4 GTI into my MK2 Golf - obviously will need to be certed. Can anyone tell me how the process works & who are the recommended certifiers in the Auckland area? Thanks in advance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kris Posted May 4, 2015 Share Posted May 4, 2015 id just do what i want to it then cert then wof. that way you may save time and money by not getting it to wof standard then redo work to do the mods. Get all the shit ready to modify it, then get a wof while stock. Then try get it modified to fuck before the wof runs out. That's what I'd do. If the rego is still live. I.e you could just take it for a WOF inspection and if it passes register it. Then I would just modify it and get a LVV Cert completed. Its irrelevant how long its been in unwarranted. Thanks all. Decisions decisions.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bathcollector Posted May 5, 2015 Share Posted May 5, 2015 is this for real/should we share it about Clint? was posted on my other favorite car forums page more : http://lowvolumevehicle.co.nz/2015/04/nzta-clearly-does-not-have-very-high-standards/ alot of hot air or something the "We" (as car enthusiasts) should be concerned with remove if spam/not public material John Brett is a fuckwit, plain and simple. He could quite easily cause a big stink. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glen Posted May 7, 2015 Share Posted May 7, 2015 Falken tires says no more stance for you. Falken Tyres NZ distributor have released a service bulletin going out to all nz Falken tyre distributors as well as all NZ LVVTA certifiers in regards to the stretching of Falken branded tyres. For a while now many have used Falken branded tyres stretching onto wide rims because of a printed document stating Falken branded tyres to legally stretch further than that of other brands and the lvvta tyre compatibility guide. THIS IS NOW VOID & FALKEN TYRES FALL UNDER THE SAME TYRE COMPATIBILITY GUIDE ISSUED BY THE LVVTA PLEASE FIND LINK BELOW FOR LVVTA TYRE STRETCH GUIDELINES http://www.lvvta.org.nz/…/LVVTA_Info_01-2009_V2_Tyre_Size_t… PLEASE FEEL FREE TO SHARE THIS WITH PEOPLE THIS MAY EFFECT BUILDING MODIFIED CARS TO MEET CERTIFICATION STANDARDS 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.