Jump to content

Rookie Daves Lie-too-us Seven


KKtrips

Recommended Posts

If you fit something like a 4.7 ratio but your gearbox isnt able to shift any faster than it did before you have this problem:

It's normally (for example) 3 seconds accellerating through 1st, 1 second gear change, 4 seconds through 2nd, 1 second gear change, 5 seconds through 3rd, 1 second gear change, 6 seconds through 4th.

total time 3+1+4+1+5+1+6 = power to the ground 85% of the time.

Then with a modified final drive you end up with:

2 seconds accellerating through 1st, 1 second gear change, 3 seconds through 2nd, 1 second gear change, 4 seconds through 3rd, 1 second gear change, 5 seconds through 4th.

total time: 2+1+3+1+4+1+5 = power to the ground 82% of the time.

Since you're spending less time putting power to the ground, if my shoddy maths is correct then in the above example it's the equivilent to losing 4.5hp across your powerband on a 150hp engine.

You get the illusion of more power since it gets through each gear quicker, and feels racier, but you end up slower overall. It gets even worse if you were previously topping out your speed in the 1:1 gear (fourth) but now shifting into an overdrive gear instead which has a higher transmission loss.

Race cars which have close ratio gearboxes and high final drives generally do so in conjunction with a gearbox that can smash through the gears almost instantly, and an engine redline that's much higher than a standard one. Also the top gear is generally a 1:1. As otherwise it's not worth the extra time spent chopping through the gears.

It's a bit more complicated when it comes to a track with corners, but personally I dont think changing final drive ratio acheives as much as people tend to think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 205
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

When you have no torques, it does make a difference.

Only in first gear, as that's the only time you're out of the powerband. But there's generally an abundance of torque in first regardless. After that you're at the mercy of your gearbox ratios and how many rpms it drops between gear changes.

If the problem is that at 5500rpm you've got no power, and it dips to that rpm, it's the gearbox ratios that will fix the problem not the final drive.

 

I found the change from a 4.3 to a 4.66 made a huge difference, got the car up in the revs where it makes power much bettererer.

If you shift at redline each time, it's still going to drop by the same amount of revs per gear change regardless of final drive ratio.

A 4.66 helps you get out of the slump in first gear, but that's it. It moves the peaks, but it moves the troughs too.

I'll put together a technical illustration later with MSpaint to explain further

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

the road speeds get closer but not the engine rpms

if it dropped into a torque hole before it will still drop into it but it will be able to pull a little easier because you are going slower - this isnt neccesarily faster is what roman is saying.

so when you change gear the rpms drop the same amount, just the gearchange is at a different road speed.

you change the final drive to suit the track and the closeness of the gears to suit the engine.

i.e. put a diesel in the lotus

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...