Jump to content

zep

Administrators
  • Posts

    4664
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by zep

  1. 1 hour ago, cletus said:

    The way I interpret the book, it is OK to do seat anchorages the way you want to. 

    They aren't attached to panel steel floor, so does not have to be doubler plates 

     

    Bump stops on shocks will be fine as long as they limit travel before anything fouls 

     

     

    20230522_103020.jpg

    20230522_103145.jpg

    Cheers Clint, you're the man :)

  2. 16 hours ago, cletus said:

    Ive got to have a look next time im on a computer if that method is still ok 

    The seat standard and CCM mentions that you CANNOT weld seat anchorages to a unibody vehicle 

    I have certed a lot of them like the pics, because its a time tested way of doing it  but i have a vague recollection of a certifier update saying it cant be done unless it has an authority card 

    Thanks Clint. Happy to do it another way if needed. Just wanna make sure I do it right!

    Another question of the fun bumpstop kind - since I'm swapping to rear coilovers, strengthening the towers and all that jazz, can I now just rely on the bumpstops integrated into the shocks? My understanding of the manual suggests it's ok.

  3. 17 minutes ago, Snoozin said:

    100% would be putting the seat fabric into the door cards, it'd look ace.

    You could ditch the door handle things entirely in favour of a Porsche RS style fabric door pull.

    I did look into this, but the handles are actually great elbow rests, so I'm not too keen to get rid of them.

     

    46 minutes ago, Early jap nuter said:

    I’ve done afew door cards with bung angled handles.most of the time we just re drilled the holes in the door to straighten handle. Small rivnut/plusnut seem to hold better and flex a lot less

    That is a smart idea. I'll have a nosey around the door and see how it attaches. Sitting at this computer, my gut tells me that it's some kind of plastic riv nut as the screws are quite coarse thread.

     

    36 minutes ago, Early jap nuter said:

    Most people paint the inside of the door to match.You can wrap the metal part of the inside of the door in vinyl and hide the seem behind the rubber seal

    I have full length cards that cover the lower part, so that's not an issue.

  4. 1 hour ago, shizzl said:

    Yup that’s it.

    they hold up fine in rally cars even after cartwheeling down a bank.

     

    the weld on tabs are good, allows you to move the seat inline with the steering wheel if it’s on the piss from the factory

    Sweet, hopefully Clint comes back with the go ahead for certing purposes.

    • Like 1
  5. @cletus What's the deal with making seat mounts like this? I have Sparco sliders that I'd like to bolt to them. Is welding them with end plates like that ok? I don't need them to be removable, and I'd only be able to put doublers in the trans tunnel, not in the sills. Should be way stronger than the stock mounts that I was going to make an adapter plate for, since they are just spot welded in!

    AE86 Toyota Corolla Rally Car Build... - Page 2 - EvolutionM - Mitsubishi  Lancer and Lancer Evolution Community

  6. On 19/05/2023 at 13:28, Snoozin said:

    My (misguided, not rooted in any sort of design background) advice would be to make sure your seat and door trims maintain some carry over, whether it be in textiles used, or patterning etc.

    The idea behind mine was to look conceivably factory, I didn't want to stray from the OEM insert style and stitching, but also needed it to flow to the seats without being too over the top. I don't think quilted or hex stitching is going to complement the kind of fabric you're working with at all, especially given your fabric is already a chequer of sorts, you'll end up with all sorts of contrasting lines and it could look a mess.

    If if were me, I would simply take that "ribbed" section, make it a fabric insert that's smooth and not stitched, and mimic the pressed bits at door handle height in stitching, maybe contrasting to match the tones in your fabric.

    It's simple, but simple never goes out of fashion.

    Yeah, I totally get that. Are you suggesting to use the checker fabric in the door cards? I did buy an extra metre just incase that's what I wanted to do.

     

    I do find the angles between the ribbed area and the handle slightly annoying. Was thinking of reworking the shape of the ribbed section so it's lines are more complementary with the handle.

  7. 15 hours ago, GARDRB said:

    Any requirements for your doorcards? Are you wanting a speaker, pocket or armrest?

    This dude does cool porsche doorcards and interiors https://www.instagram.com/carboneliveries/
    image.png.3b42b58f8e7dfd34cf3224fa5f42ede3.png

     

    MK1 and 2 Golf interiors are good for inspiration too

    No speaker as there isn't room, just the stock armrest and a pocket might be cool but it'd have to be a floppy one.

    13 hours ago, Thousand Dollar Supercar said:

    Or if you're cheap and lazy and your door cards are in good condition, do this with black vinyl paint and stick-on chrome moulding strip:

    holden-gemini-interior1.jpg.195dcd3df8daee85b341c6370840a2f3.jpg.cbf10248c931faa1ae71a9b3b424139d.jpg

    Now it's the deluxe spec. :king:

    Plus you haven't added any extra colours / textures.

    My main OCD gripe with the factory door cards in that picture is that the pull handle isn't quite horizontal, but the embossed lines in the door card are! This gives the appearance of a British car where they intended to get the pull handle horizontal but they didn't do a very good job, so it ended up crooked. If you made new door cards, you could eliminate horizontal reference lines in the vicinity of the pull handle so this wouldn't stand out. :P

    The stock ones are well gone. I've got new board to make some out of. And I totally agree about the pull handle, such an odd choice. My pull handles are black and I plan for most of the card to be black, but I also bought enough of the Porsche chequered fabric to do an insert.

  8. 22 hours ago, GARDRB said:

    I'm not sure if you're worried about manufacturing cost, but it may be cheaper to make those from two laser cut pieces of plate that bolt together like Barry does with his MRP caliper brackets then getting them machined from a single piece. You'd want to make sure @cletus is ok with it of course.

    Screenshot 2022-11-24 at 10.47.40 AM.png

    Yeah, I've thought about this. The hardest part with that is that the back of the rotor is deeper than the front of the hub's caliper mount, so it will always need some kind of dog-legged bit.

    • Like 1
  9. 2 hours ago, cletus said:

    I think it might be a bit thin to do out of aluminum,  steel would be a safer bet unless you could supply some sort of proof that it would be up to the task 

    Threads directly into 8mm alloy wouldn't be allowed,  from memory wilwood brake kits (that do have thin aluminum brackets) have steel inserts for threads  

    Thanks. I'll make it out of steel. Could probably size up to 10mm at the caliper side just to be safe, just doesn't leave much room between the bracket at disc (approx 3mm).

  10. Cheers @sr2! I guess I should clarify that the standard car has solid rotors and twin piston calipers with a 48.1mm piston: 1,817sqmm. I upgraded to the 38mm floating and am going back down slightly to the 35.1mm fixed. So relative to a stock car the Wilwoods are up 213%, and the VT sliders were up 250%. I reckon the actual pad contact area will be relatively similar - hard to know as measurements for pads are not the actual material but the overall size!

    My thoughts re the loss of clamping area - I was probably over braked before, if that's a thing. I know of a few actual race cars that run the same rear brakes as I have, and front 4-pots with 36.1mm pistons (Rx-7 calipers). If they can stop a car at race speeds (albeit in a car that is probably lighter than mine), then I think the 35.1 pistons should be ok. Hopefully any discrepancy will be small enough that changing pad compound and making adjustments to the bias will be enough to compensate.

  11. 22 minutes ago, mjrstar said:

    Real question is why go for the 4 pots? Is it to make it look cool, as there isn't too much wrong with a well set-up 2 piston sliding caliper from a performance perspective.

     

    You caught me! Nah, the setup I had on there before, while working well, needed to have the steering lock reduced so the calipers didn't hit the LCAs. It also pushed the track out 10mm each side, which is cool if you want wide stance but I'd rather my wheels sit inside the stock guards nicely.

    I also need to find a disc to make these clear my wheels, but that's another issue all together.

    • Haha 1
  12. I'm upgrading my front brakes from a sliding setup to 4-pots, but having trouble figuring out which Wilwood calipers I should buy in terms of piston size to ensure it works with my current setup. Right now it feels good under foot.

    Current setup:

    Front calipers: 2 piston sliders 38mm x 2
    Rear calipers: 1 piston sliders 29mm x1
    Master: 1"
    Boosted
    Bias valve for the rear
    Pedal ratio: 5:1.

    Wilwood have a few options for the piston sizes, with all four being the same size: 44.5mm, 35.1mm or 25.4mm.

    Some things I've read say to only calculate the area of 2 pistons (one side) in a 4pot setup, but surely all pistons need to move?

    What will be the result if I size up or down piston size?

     

    Cheers

×
×
  • Create New...