Jump to content

yoeddynz

Area Reps
  • Posts

    17444
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    134

Posts posted by yoeddynz

  1. On 26/02/2024 at 19:06, kiwi808 said:

    A heap of those Bren gun carriers ended up as farm hacks down my ways. #sharn

    Here is part of my current pile of shame.

    IMG_2779.thumb.jpeg.7a0243b262c6c2f9d18f43e4f1cf7129.jpeg
     

    I might dig out that LRDG truck and have a look…

     

    That's mighty impressive. Well done you. I'm going to have to up my game.

    • Like 3
  2. On 15/03/2024 at 21:15, GregT said:

    Changing the cams direction of rotation is only the start - and probably the easiest bit. Plus it's probably one of the ones affected by the recall.    Honda haven't come up with a fix for the bolt breaking yet. The head gets stuck in the gearbox and locks everything up solid - which can and often does break the cases.

    I'd not be worried about that because one would still be stripping the engine right down and potentially cutting down the crank case/cutting off the transmission case like I did to lower the cg. There'd be no transmission to jam :grin:

    @NickJ I dunno and offset. I never really liked at that aspect but I have a feeling the crank centre line is inline with the bores and I can't remember seeing much, if any, offset on the gudgeon pins. But I guess there must be a bit of offset on the pins because the pistons are marked for fitment the correct way up. 

    Not sure if the 1800s have hydraulic cam chain tensioners which could make things that bit more tricky. I have never looked into those engines myself but curious. They are pretty cheap to buy in the US and if 'easily' changed to clockwise rotation  would be a neat engine for all sorts of applications. 

     

    • Like 1
  3. Regards the driveshafts. I chatted to my hotrod friend, ran the two ideas I had come up with and he suggested an even neater, stronger, failsafe way to do it. But I had to get another pair of scooby shafts because I'd already chopped the ones I had down in length :doubt:

    I won't go into details here because I'll spend enough time doing that in the build thread  but I'm super happy with the results. 

    As for fuel tank, yeah since I've added a bolt down hatch to place the pump inside is now modified so I'll look for a suitable plastic box*  for the battery (it's quite small though)  I can't line my alloy box because I made it to suit the battery and it's bloody snug in there. I could line the outside but it would end up messy I bet.

     

    *off Alex goes - rummaging through the Sistema range of kitchenware/fuel tank/battery boxes at the warehouse. 

    • Like 5
  4. A friend in the UK was given an 1800 engine from a fire damaged bike. He's not properly looked at it (because he's always starting new projects and never finishes anything.. He should be on os :tongue:) but he reckons the camshafts could be run in reverse and by changing the chain tensioner location the engine could be changed to clockwise rotation. I have not really looked into those engines because it's hard enough finding a 1500 and an 1800 engine would be moonbeams from a wrecker. But they are lighter and have fuel infection already fitted. 

    • Like 2
    • Confused 1
  5. Couple of questions that I need clearing up on. I have the lvvta manual and with regards to driveshafts I cant find any mention of halfshafts on IRS setups.

    I plan on joining 2/3rds Subaru leone shaft to 1/3 Hillman imp shaft (both same diameter) I'd like to do the job myself because I feel confident enough as an engineer. I am happy to have them crack tested if that's needed. I will be visiting my hotrod builder mate in motueka (who's well known with most certifiers) and running a couple of ideas past him.  Does this all seem fine?

    Another thing I have spotted in the manual is this...

    'Where a battery, and fuel system components, such as a fuel
    tank or fuel pump, are located within the same compartment in a
    low volume vehicle, the battery and the fuel system components
    must be separated from each other by the enclosure of one or
    both within a secured fuel-resistant non-conductive container'

    But at the start of the chapter on fuel systems it states this...

    'Note that where a production vehicle is fitted with its original fuel tank or other fuel system
    components in their original locations, the requirements in this chapter do not apply'

    I have my battery mounted very securely within an alloy box above the tank, the box is bolted to the firewall. The leads are secured within flexible conduit that's attached to the firewall before running into the interior.

    I'll be using the original tank is but fitting the small nissan micra fuel injection pump within, through the top where I'll be making a sealed bolt down lid just large enough to get the pump in. (cant quite squeeze it through the hole the fuel level sender fits through)   There's no room for a surge tank, nor do I want to go down the route of a noisy external pump again.

    Does this seem all ok ?

×
×
  • Create New...