Jump to content

Hurmeez

Members
  • Posts

    341
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Hurmeez

  1. I got my axles back from the machinist for an unbelievably good price so I can start getting them set up to go back into the diff. 

    I made a start by pressing the brand new bearings on. 4vEc0rn.jpg

    A handy thing about the skyline axles is they have identical bearing faces to the Falcon axles I got rid of out of my housing. So two brand new Falcon bearings later and I have a fully together diff and a rolling chassis once more. 

    Next, I threw my mockup brake setup on. XH1vwCI.jpg

    I quickly noticed a problem when I went to bolt the wheel on. QTyh50M.jpg

    The caliper actually sticks out further than the wheel mounting face. I'm not exactly sure how the Mondeo wheel looks, but I'm getting the idea that it must have a bit of offset with a mounting face the same diameter as the brake disk. The Cheviot Turbos that I have have a mounting face that is bigger than the brake disk face, so it doesn't sit down properly. 

    My best solution for this is a 10mm wheel spacer. I made a mockup out of MDF to test my hypothesis. 813NSJX.jpg

    According to the Hobby Car bible, this would meet almost all the requirements of a wheel spacer. It also has the bonus effect of making the wheel hub-centric, because the turbos have a larger center hole than the standard Escort sized hub spigot and are do not transfer the load to it on a normal English diff. 

    The only thing I'm not sure of is the requirement for the spacer to "be set-screwed or attached by another secure mechanical method to either the wheel or hub face." Does the fact that it is clamped by the wheel nuts not cover this? Or would I have to drill and tap countersunk screws into the mounting face of the wheel to ensure they are compliant? 

    In any case, I threw the mockup spacer on to check fitments. 

    MHOy9UV.jpg

    Here you can see that it provides a mounting face with sufficient clearance to the caliper.  LKK35oV.jpg

    And the hub centric support: 9XVaVQJ.jpg

    In the final version, I would probably make the center a blind hole that sits snugly over the axle spigot for extra support. 

    And finally, the wheels fill out the arch much better in my opinion with just that 10mm extra track width per side. 85autWb.jpg

    And with the center caps on, you'd never know the difference. MgFdhLf.jpg

    While typing all this, I had the thought that Mondeo front disks may have a different offset between the braking face and wheel mounting face which may solve this whole thing. It wouldn't solve the hub concentricity issues though. I think I'll still go to the wreckers and have a look but I'm open to suggestions. 

    Cheers. 

    • Like 9
  2. Man I almost missed the engine jamming out too hard to those sick beats! I wonder if Kelford would be able to regrind the standard cams to an even more aggressive profile? I'm glad I bought the DE engine first now so I can swap in the reportedly superior valve train components. 

    • Like 1
  3. You know, I knew all of that already but I never put the fact that you could wrap the throttle cable around the pulley as much as you like and it's still only going to pull it through 90 degrees if you've got the radius of the wheel right. The fact that yours was wrapped almost half way round was really messing with my head. Thanks for explaining it so well. 

    • Like 1
  4. The next job was to get the diff mounts sorted. I found some suitable box section and carved it up into something resembling a diff mount. eEq02zK.jpg

    I copied the original Escort pads in pretty much every way to make sure they'd fit the standard springs nicely. Then I welded up the original holes in the shock plate/spring mount and redrilled them further apart to take the bigger Falcon U-bolts. fC2dgFd.jpg

    I bought a new set of springs for it a while ago because I thought mine looked pretty shagged. They were making a W shape rather than a U when there was any weight in the back of the car. So I threw them in and it bolted up, set all my angles, and jacked from the centre section to see what ride height I'd get from the new springs. fuwb5Je.jpg

    Just to prevent any confusion, that is the car sitting on bump stops. With no weight to speak of in it. With my new springs. Yayy.

    So I had another look at my original springs. It turns out they'd been subjected to the ole' flipped leaf, hence their W shape. wb2tpqu.jpg

    So I disassembled them and put them back together in the right order and swapped them back in to find that they gave me a ridiculous monster truck ride. So I swapped the centre leaf of the original spring for the two centre ones out of the new set and tried it again. That finally sorted it out. I didn't actually get any photos but I think it's something like a two-inch drop from stock. 

    It did come with a whole new set of problems though. Measuring the angle on the gearbox output shaft gave me an angle of 8.5 degrees down. So I set the angle on the input shaft to 8.5 degrees up at ride height to make sure the drive angles were equal and I'd avoid any vibrations etc in the U joints. Then I measured the angle of the driveshaft itself and got 2.5 degrees. IKRnhoH.jpg

    This means the U joint angles would come to a total of 6 degrees. Now everywhere I've looked online says that 10 degrees is the absolute maximum you want to run on a driveshaft U joint but anything less than 5 degrees is far more ideal. Now I wasn't completely happy but I was willing to just run it with the 6 and hope for the best but there was one other thing that meant I forced myself to do something about it. 

    With the engine at its current angle, I was going to have a clearance issue between the front passenger side throttle linkage and the bonnet. I worked out that if I were to raise the gearbox cross-member by ~50mm, it'd put the driveshaft angle down to something closer to 4 degrees, as well as getting ~10mm of clearance for the throttle linkage at its closest point. The only other option would be to drop the engine down. But I've already go it as low as possible with the standard cross member and any more and I'd have to start modifying the steering rack mounts and suspension geometry and that's a huge can of worms that I have absolutely no intention of opening. 

    So next job was to make a riser for the transmission tunnel. As per, I started with a CAD template, F6NC74x.jpg

    Then steel, 3kuYFQl.jpg

    Welded in my original boot mounting ring, bBqfJKp.jpg

    Tacked it, Xv3ovDl.jpg

    And welded it. 9lh2xWe.jpg

    I reckon with a custom centre console and a standard looking vinyl shift boot, I can cover the whole thing and still have it looking fairly standard. g69Vgub.jpg

    Finally I made a new gear box cross member to lift it up into its new home. 2wdIJWz.jpg

    I'm much happier with this one. Here you can see just how far I've raised everything by the difference in cross members. Jbnd38x.jpg o8n8YBc.jpg

    Still no rear axles though so I can't fully and finally sort out the diff mounts and rear brakes yet. That's it for now. I'm planning on working on the throttle linkage and pedal setup next. 

    • Like 7
  5. @fuel I did consider a cross ram style intake but as @yoeddynz said, the port spacing made it difficult to fit the runners between each other, especially with the 50mm tubing I had to work with. It is a shame cause they're a great packaging solution and look great too!

    @Transom I didn't realise that about the vent tubes. You're exactly right about the pcv being directly under a runner on the other side. I was going to come up with a custom tight radius 90 degree bend to fit it but if I could just plug it and use the driver's side vent then that'd be a lot easier. 

    • Like 1
  6. I had no idea it had been a whole month since the last update. There hasn't been a lot of solid progress in any one place but there has been lots of small progress in different mini projects. 

    Firstly, I got the intake situation all pinned down and finalised. I actually fairly radically changed the layout and turned the whole thing on its head. Literally. To start though, I cut what was left of the original manifold down even further, before making up some transition pieces out of the 50mm tubing I've been using, and tacked them into place. DZFSmHo.jpg

    The welding on these more heavy materials isn't so difficult but once I moved on to tacking the donut sections I really started to struggle. That said, I persevered and got two manifolds fully tacked and bolted on. wvplOd0.jpg BUgBM0A.jpg

    You'll notice a couple of things. Firstly, the throttle bodies are now the other way up to how I originally had them. Second, the right-hand bank has two sections of donut to make up a single bend. That was because when I decided to flip them all I realised I didn't have enough left of the donuts to do it out of one piece anymore, thus, two bits. 

    As for the reason I wanted to flip them in the first place, doing it this way gives me twice as much room for air cleaners/trumpets on the passenger side bank, ipsydKs.jpg LgQYEaI.jpg

    (forgive the paint stick rule) as well as clearing my original clutch reservoir position, pfmfi4q.jpg

    while still clearing the valve cover vent on the driver's side too. mmNsnlf.jpg

    It's going to be a little close between the throttle linkage on the passenger side and the bonnet but if that's the only issue then I'm a very happy camper indeed. 

    One last beauty shot from above, oljJBig.jpg

    Before I sent it away to get fully welded. While I'm sure with enough time and perseverance I could have gotten everything stuck together in a way that would hold water, the money I would have spent in replacing the donuts I rooted in the process would have quickly outpaced the cost of asking a professional nicely to do it. That and the fact that it's such a central piece of the visual puzzle under the bonnet, I'd rather pay for some stacked dimes then make my own bird shit. Hopefully it won't take too long. I'll be sure to show it off once it's back. 

     

     

    • Like 6
  7.  

    1 minute ago, d.p.n.s said:

    If you got the rails with it you could just use that and the injector holes and just use small tubes with o ring at each end instead of the injectors.

    And use that as the IACV system.

    That's a good idea actually. I'll have to look at it a bit more. 

    • Like 1
  8. I see. That's interesting, perhaps the V10s are slightly different to the I6s because I don't remember any other ports on the body. I'm planning on drilling and tapping some small barb fittings into the runners and plumbing them into a fabricated reservoir that sits on top of the injectors. It should look good and cover up the plastic tops of the injectors. I think I'll put a frost plug type bung in the standard injector port. 

    • Like 1
  9. Keeping notes is always a good idea in my experience too. I've got a whole clear file full of receipts and details about which parts I've used and what wrecker car they've come off and so forth. Should be invaluable when the gearbox mount wears out or I need a rebuild kit for the brakes or what have you.

    I actually found a neat little cardboard number wheel from BOC in the empire of dirt the other day that tells you what amps, filler, gas, travel speed, dip rate etc. etc. to use for a bunch of different material gauges and types. It's bloody handy but now I have to figure out where the safe place is that I saved it. 

×
×
  • Create New...