Jump to content

RXFORD

Members
  • Posts

    791
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by RXFORD

  1. 9 hours ago, MRWEST said:

    ahhhhh shit. so iv got a alloy tank in the rx3 now with an intank pump inside the tank, to replace the factory tank. so this means now need to work out how to seal boot? or is the fact the pump is inside the tank make it ok, as obviously cant put a box around fuel tank......

    Been a while since I discussed it with @cletus for my application, but from what I remember, its more to do with the connections inside the vehicle. So if you have hose connections/clamps that could possibly break or leak, or any sort of flanged/removable connection, then there is a chance fuel vapor could get into passenger cabin if there was a slight leak etc. Which is why sealing off the boot is needed.

    In my case, all the fuel fittings were under the floor, but because the filler neck passed through cabin and it had 2 hose clamps connecting filler neck to tank, I had to seal it off.

    I could be wrong but I think we established that if I made a fancier filler neck connection under floor with a low profile o-ringed flange or something like that then I wouldn't have need a sealed off cover.

    But I'm not sure about whether sealing is required if you have a 100% sealed tank with all connections/fittings under floor when you do a carb to efi swap. Probably depends on how your tank is setup. If you intank pump has a flanged access point inside the boot like Kellys surge pot does, then that would likely be classed as a potential leak point. 

     

  2. 5 hours ago, RUNAMUCK said:

    This image triggers the shit out of my OCD. It looks like two zinc plated, one stainless, and one black. *shudders*

    Screenshot_20240511-195118_Chrome.jpg

    Totally racist, need a yellow zinc to balance out the diversity. 

    • Haha 2
  3. 1 hour ago, cletus said:

    im going to invent a religion like the amish or similar

    you cannot track me via devices in the heavens, only the almighty god/allah/jeebus/flying spaghetti monster/hypnotoad can track me, he came to me in a dream to tell me so. also you may not replicate my image in video or picture form with these devil boxes you call 'speed cameras'

    Just claim that you are a sovereign citizen, then use lots of big legal words to sound intelligent & threatening.

    • Like 1
    • Haha 1
  4. ^  With all the privacy laws we have, I don't see how a fulltime gps tracking system like E-road or similar for ruc management/speeding etc could be passed here for private vehicles. 

    Massive invasion of privacy not to mention a target for hacking so crims can find/follow the desirable vehicles easier. E-road already causes big problems between staff in the workplace for company vehices, so it would be a disaster for private vehicles.

    • Like 2
  5. The Por15 and Kbs tank sealers are decent. Have used them plenty. 

    Its best to get the tank acid/chemical stripped first, but short of that, chucking a heap of clean shingle in there and shaking the fuck out of it will get any loose shit off and key the surface. A wash out with thinners will give it a good residue free clean, then you can go through the coating process which usually have a phosphoric based metal prep as part of it. 

    • Like 1
  6. 24 minutes ago, zep said:

    My diff has been shortened but I have realised that it would be good to come in about 5-10mm more on each side. Since all the brackets are already welded on, would it be okay to cut the axle housing flanges off, remove that 5-10mm, and weld them back on? I would shorten the axles at the splines to suit.

    Technically no if it was spotted because you are not allowed to weld castings, which is why I shorten them through the housing tubes.

    If you remade the flanges from weldable steel however...

  7. Get an initial inspection done and have a chat with repair certifier to undertand the process. He will say what he wants to see and how he would like it done. He will also tell you at what stages he needs to come back for progress inspections, which will depend of the level of repairs needed.

    And take a shitload of photos throughout.

     

    Can give you a more detailed example of the way I go through the process if you want to pm me. 

    • Like 3
  8. I get the nostalgia but the Kiwi rotary scene is weird when it comes to wheels.

    Any other scene you get given shit for putting either cheap/fake wheels on an expensive car, or expensive/genuine wheels on a shitbox. 

    The kiwi rotary scene though, get fizzed up over cheap/common wheels on expensive cars. 70% of the scene probably run 5 different types of rims that cost a grand or so.

    Nowhere near as bad as the Aussie rotary scene and I'm not really picking sides, its just an observation. I find it odd/interesting that you hardly see early mazdas with old 3pc jap wheels built out like the old Toyota scene. 

     

     

    • Like 4
  9. You need at least 0.5° operating angle on a UJ. Lesser the front shaft angle difference the better but not less than 0.5°. Currently you are at 0°. And max 3-3.5° operating angle on front UJ out of box.

    Now if you raise the hanger bearing so front UJ operating angle is 0.5-1° (front shaft initial angle of ~4° down) it will lessen the centre and rear UJ angles and still be within the max 3° front UJ angle.

    Centre and rear UJ's still have pretty bad angles but not much can be done about that without a fair bit of rework. If you set the pinion to ~6° down (flange pointing up) it will compensate for a degree or so of bushing flex under acceleration and get you close enough to where it should be happy.

    Link design/geometry will play a big part in driveline performance too, but thats confusion for another day. 

     

     

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  10. Because you have a greater angle on the gearbox than the first shaft, raising the hanger will make the operating angle of the front UJ worse and its already at 3.5° based on the angles you mentioned on box and first shaft, so wouldn't really want to go any more than that. 

    The lower the first shaft angle, the less rotational pulsation the second shaft will have to try cancel out. The higher the rpm, the lower the operating angle should be. 

     

    If it was the other way around like most vehicles, for example the gearbox was 3° down and the first shaft was 6.5° down, then raising the hanger would help get the front UJ to a lesser angle.

     

    Are you sure the box is 6.5° with carb where it needs to be? Are you measuring that off the crank pulley/sump? Seems like alot. I can't remember what the last rotary I mounted ended up being with the carb level tbh.

    Post up a rough/close enough angle of the rear shaft when you get a chance. I'l calc it how it currently sits and see what the pinion ends up at.

×
×
  • Create New...