Jump to content

gibbon

Members
  • Posts

    1850
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by gibbon

  1. yeah good point - the rotax would probably throw a fit if you started giving it the sort of throttle input that a car gets

    also generally these EFI aircraft engines have a constant speed prop attached, so even if it did ran sub-optimally for a few seconds while it got it's EGT feedback, the prop would just fine out to keep the RPM constant, so you'd see a decrease in MAP instead and have a mathematical decrease in airspeed but you probably wouldn't even feel it. same setup in a car and there'd be bogging down, RPM decay etc

    moral of the story is carbys rule

    • Like 1
  2. Come to think of it we look after a couple of machines with fuel injected rotax engines that don't have manual mixture adjustment, can run avgas, and don't have o2 sensors... They must be able to compensate for altitude somehow and I can't imagine they do it without some kind of feedback. The ecu is definitely not connected to the altimeter 

  3. Ok so my takeaway here is that a wideband is more of a tuning aid than anything else? I guess cars trundle around in open loop from time to time anyway. Still I'm curious to know the answer from a hypothetical point of view - can an ecu extrapolate meaningful feedback with an EGT sensor rather than o2

×
×
  • Create New...