Jump to content

Roman

Members
  • Posts

    6784
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    32

Posts posted by Roman

  1. 3 minutes ago, HumberSS said:

    Do these k100 throttles on this build solve your height problems?

     

    Nah those are way too small throttle size, and the ones I've got are e-throttle.
    The height will be better once the sump is on, and I can measure how much further I can cut down my engine mounts to lower it.
    I should probably just print another sump piece for the area under the crossmember, buuuuttttt printer is broken again. damn thing.
    Not a drama though as I've got plenty else to carry on with. 
    Wiring is a big job.

    • Like 2
  2. At the moment I am leaning towards the idea of leaving the cap in the standard spot but extending it upwards.
    Then I can just jack the back of the car up to help bleed any air out of the radiator I guess.
    As much as I hated the electric waterpump in the Echo, it was handy for bleeding the coolant with the motor off.
     

    • Like 1
  3. From what I've seen/read the flow restriction from an open butterfly is essentially negligable if your runners are the right diameter. 

    I think the only practical benefit of a barrel is that they can be the same (non circular) profile as the port. 

    I found some pictures of a really interesting intake setup from an Indy Car a while ago. 
    They had butterfly throttles but mounted way out at the tip of the trumpet. 

    32214677_10155626209972198_2146063156286324736_n.thumb.jpg.ae1ed95525c140eee65e64a3c98dac8d.jpg

    32130406_10155626209957198_7231741718255632384_n.thumb.jpg.35ff1b4ea2f427c32cb95c9cc18041e8.jpg

    32076797_10155626209932198_5270931354828144640_n.jpg.bd1042141947b6b313f01cc34560bf92.jpg


    Then some double barrels from one of the vauxhall BTCC cars.

    32116683_10155626234672198_3551599360045219840_n.jpg.79608f48f6ae5b356c7510fddf60207e.jpg

    32089950_10155626234657198_6319566711276175360_n.jpg.0a2eeea49eb15c4defca31e0211b92df.jpg

     

    32089751_10155626234492198_8301808875611357184_n.jpg

    32116265_10155626234472198_1781600877316931584_n.jpg

    32089435_10155626234462198_1090860438360424448_n.jpg

    • Like 3
    • Thanks 1
  4. A mate told me that's what happened when he ran barrel throttles. Horrible rich on transients if you've been cruising along at part throttle for a while.
    As you've got two pinch points for where it is restricting airflow, with the partially open barrel area in the middle. Compared to normal throttle plate where you just have ahead or behind the plate.
    So its something like you get a differing amount of vacuum (or airspeed or whatever) in the barrel than either ahead of behind it, so fuel vapour even from port injection ends up condensing in there.
    (I'm assuming they were mounted quite close to the head in that case) 

    In my case this motor has exceptionally long ports, and I want to get both the barrel assembly as close to the flange as possible, and the injector as close as possible too. 
    In a more ideal situation I'd probably cut down the super long port dividers and mount an injector closer to the valves. As this is all geometry not designed for port injection at all.



     

  5. Silver lining - the auto bellhousing centralizes by just pressing a circle thing onto a circle thing. No randomly placed dowels to try align.

    So it might work out well to chop down the j160 bell and weld on a centralized circle plate with matching holes. So the whole auto housing on there. 

    That messes with clutch fork situation but id prefer peace of mind that its exactly centralized with fewer variables as possible.

    Also, Toyota used the "fuck you and your whole family" variant of loctite on the bolts so that was fun. No way i was getting this loose with tools i had.

    received_5680097998760453.jpeg

    • Like 7
×
×
  • Create New...