-
Posts
3265 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
Posts posted by kpr
-
-
interesting stuff.
The pistons in my short rod engine are 404 grams, inc pin and rings. rods around 465 grams.
Long rod engine was stock pistons- 443 grams , rods 487 grams
guessing the long rod, even though pulling a few less g's would more likely to fly to bits due to the piston weight.
- 1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
6-1 in firing order please.
Also isn't there a free 1nzfe oil filter housing, on the side of the road not far from you?
- 3
- 10
-
those bolts holding headers on that alfa thing look like they would ruin your life
Yeah unsure if the sudden change in cross section is a good thing or bad thing. but can say the cobys i tested with the ugly big open collector made less power everywhere. other being not very even, primary lengths were similar to my headers. so the the collector was the main difference. soo seems like at least cutting down that space maybe a good thing. or possible just the shape?
If it was some way possible to eliminate said change in area would primary length be irrelevant.
Also any sudden change in cross sectional area i have tested in various places in exhaust, has always given negative or at least no gains. where as changing the same transition to a diverging cone has given some power gain.- 3
- 1
-
Guess there are 2 different ways of thinking.
Treat like 2 3 cylinder engines - merge collector cone up to 3" into some big reso's then merge into a singe 3" after them
Attempt to get some secondary tuning from the 2 pipes after the primary's, keeping them smaller, 2" or so into a 2nd merge, cone out into 3.5" into a big single reso. drop back to 3" after said reso.
Either way i think your just under 2" or 2" "pinch point" after the merge sounds about right.
Also the pipes after the primary collector should be even length, to stop it sounding like balls. guessing you already come to that conclusion though.
How long are your primary tubes going to be?
- 1
-
Closed loop should only be there for a fine trim. if isn't running right in open loop, tune sucks or something has gone wrong.
As roman said. too many variables to use egt to tune. main use of egt probes is to see if you have a cylinder/s running different than the rest. rather than having a wideband in each cylinder.
Just tune it right with wideband, then run in "open loop"
-
On 07/06/2023 at 14:16, Rhyscar said:
Kinda makes you wonder if theres value in considering 2x different intake lengths?
Can be used to smooth out the bumps in power curve. But having runners all the same length, at the ideal length. will get you best over all power by a little bit. Also if your picky about your afr. will be a bit all over the shop,
unless tune each cylinder
- 2
-
On 31/05/2023 at 18:13, shizzl said:
I haven't play with stock stuff since forever ago, but pretty sure the bigger 2 are are water. rest are vac for various things. idle up solenoids and the likes. can block them off.
water at educated guess are far left and far right (bendy one) but should be able to figure it out by blowing through them
-
Yeah most people don't try anything that long, due to fitment / too hard basket in a lot of engine bays. But its really where the advantage is. when it comes to getting it dyno tuned. Id suggest having a way to try 20-30mm either way from that 320 length. is enough to see the power curve move around, to see if your in the right place. even though can shuffle it a bit with the vct , there still a litte bit to be had getting it bang on.
If going to make a plenum for it. make it big as possible. same deal with feed pipe.
Yeah kinda re the skunk2 manifold, the runner length thing works just the same on turbo stuff though. It keeps coming back to the packaging thing and being a diddle to make. shiny parts sell.
- 1
-
one word -> packaging
they will be aiming for the 3rd harmonic (itb's, the skunk2 maybe even 4th) im aiming for the 2nd, which is stronger = more power
tapered is said to accelerate the air. maybe. but are also losses in the pipe, so need to go bigger further from head to keep flow the same as. real world isn't much effective length difference with taper, unless is way too much. or turns into a massive bell mouth, which will act like the pipe ends part way down the bellmouth into the runner, rather than the face. in your case yeah i would taper out soon as get past the throttle plate.
Example of engine not caring too much if runners are too big; The runners on the manifold i made are 2.25" tube. think its 53 or 54mm id. half way around the bend it starts tapering down to the port. so yeah its big. bigger than the rbc intake and huge compared to the stock k24 manifold. but still gains power right down at 4000rpm. close to 10% at that point, so not a small gain either.
Another example. The only place my 4age with 52mm throttles drops below a stock engine is under 2000rpm.
- 2
- 1
-
Yup, thats the same inlet test i was referring to.
Have you looked into s65 bmw throttles? they are 52mm, spacing should be pretty close for k series. the also have an oval outlet similar shape to the port. Have a separate dbw module that can be used if wanted to go that way. but is known to crap out.
I'd probably target 8000rpm maybe a touch under for your intake runner length. about 320mm from port face should get you ballpark. you want to get the intake tuning right where the engine naturally wants to make peak power. will make more power and fatten it up that way. rather than kinda trying to force it to make more power right up top. like your current intake looks to be doing. The VCT (cam timing) is also your friend here. you can use it to hang onto the power past peak a bit longer. If do everything right it should at least match the power it has now right up top 8500- 9k and make a bunch more 7500- 8000rpm plus more through the mid range
The runner length on the manifold in video is around the 350mm mark, as was targeting bit lower rpm.
- 2
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
As above, I have been looking at some of the stuff they post. as been playing with a k24. They quote all these different gains in bhp, but the wheel hp on the same graph says something different. also mega driveline losses. Ive roughly overlaid the graphs blue is the wheel hp. red "engine" power. light lines stock intake, dark itb.
Looking at the wheel power. the stock intake manifold would be a quicker car. unless you could run between 8000 & 9000 rpm the whole time. even then wouldnt be anything in it.
Why, The itb's will probably flow more. but the runners are way to short to make any jam over the whole rev range. stock inlet will be running out of flow and or slightly too long to make power at 9k
ITB's only work good if you dial in the runner length and have the flow to go with it.
Seems to be super common with K series stuff. even the factory inlets. They are too short with big runners. or long with small runners.
I think those itb's you have will be a touch on the small side. possibly ok. but can get away with over sizing the intake a bit. not so much under sizing it. if make the runners small enough to gain in the bottom end (talking rpm you will never use in circuit car) will lose top end. if a bit too big, not much happens. not trying to lecture you, just wouldn't be fun to have to do it twice if you didn't have to.This is the intake i just made for k24. Big long runners. gains everywhere over RBC honda inlet. which is spose to make more peak power that the stock ep3 one they compared the itbs too.
- 7
- 3
-
Tuned a 1.5jz with all the good bits on it the other day. had those xpert injectors in it. maybe the 1350cc version, still a decap'd bosch either way. was happily making over 400kw, no drama tuning it.
you can also get the genuine 7 hole bosch injectors which are 980cc. if dont want a modified injector
- 1
-
looking at your thread you have something like below. and are thinking of dropping smaller after the 2.5" collector?
This is what i was meaning. angle straight down to 2" or so where all 4 pipes collect. The big straight through is key to making it work. think of the exhaust ending after them. what you do after isn't so important. long as the pipe size is big enough not restrict airflow. merging into a single 2.5" probably fine in your case. but you cant make it too big. just makes it harder to cut the noise down. all the power is in the headers and the section before the first reso's
- 3
- 1
-
run the biggest glass pack straight through muffler /resos you can fit for the first mufflers. put the chambered ones at the back
sizes yeh you can drop down smaller, but need to do it at the merge. then go back out kinda like a megaphone setup. if you do it right and place said above mufflers in right place. will gain power off the bottom.
- 2
-
1 hour ago, xsspeed said:
would be interesting to see if you could, I'm guessing either the cranks are mounted higher in a 4gr or the piston compression height is significantly different between the two (or both) to account for such stroke difference. solution is only a custom set of rods away if need be
probably just the usual shorter block height on the 4gr, usually a toyota / most manufacturers move. save some material cost and make engine bit shorter. so yeah longer rods would be needed. probably giving a rod ratio well over 2. bigger bore, bigger valves bit more capacity. probably blow the budget, but would be pretty cool if the crank did swap over
- 1
-
2gr with 4gr crank.
- 4
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
ok ok, heres an update
- 10
- 4
- 2
- 1
-
Nar sorry, ones ive been using were bran new. ( they are about 220 on amayama)
yeah the small gear. it kinda looks like its backwards when its in the right way- 1
-
Ive pulled one of those (vvti pulley) apart a million times. pretty basic. but can put the together backwards hah. only thing i suggest doing is sitting it on the cam and making sure it freely rotates through tis whole travel. there isn't really anything that locates them central, if get them a little off can bind up at at one end of the travel. I usually put it on the cam and rotate it back and forward nipping up the bolts.
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
Soo, i finally tested the airbox. turns out there is less in it that i thought. not really any difference worth worrying about. few kw. what was actually worse, was the filter by itself in the engine bay. even with the bonnet open it made a little less power than both airboxes that pull cold air. oh well least the new one matches rest of the engine bay now i guess
I also acquired this thing, its yellow and rusty. no real plans for it. but its kinda cool how it is, and actually runs super nice
i threw it on the dyno today for a laugh after finishing up the tune on the white one.
3y, 2L or raw power. smashed out a massive 49.9kw which isnt too bad considering its rated at 65kw
makes a couple more kw than the 4a at 1500rpm. the scaling maybe off slightly in favor to the 3y, but yeah..
- 16
- 1
- 2
-
Valve to valve isn't an issue in my case either with wide angle head. piston to valve = yes. The exhaust cam timing is not so much that it can be off and work. it needs to be right and when its right, its pretty happy to work across the whole rev range. when its off it kinda sucks almost everywhere
- 2
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
So there was some cyclone thing and i lost power for almost a week. The plan was to re-tune it. as was never 100% happy how it was setup, after going to itb's some time ago
This engine has always had staged injection. as when built the engine for trueno, i was too cheap to buy big injectors. so used 8x 295's had hanging around which worked all good.
when going to the bmw itb's, they have injector ports in them which suit the long nose injectors. so used the same 980cc injectors as the starlet. so 295 primary 980 secondary.
staging was never bang on and did some weird stuff. but nothing noticable to drive or harmful to engine.
So attempting to re-tune it, i basically ended up in the same place the transition was all over the shop and extra fuel compensation was way more that than it should have been.
The first part of the problem due to lack of info, and injectors being so different. if the primary and 2ndry injectors are the same, doesn't matter deadtimes and the likes are a bit off.
second problem get to that later.
Soo decided just bin the primary injectors, and run the big ones
Now the my peasant g3 link only has 2 injector drivers. even with the injectors wired into 2 groups, was getting the epic fuel hammer. which sounded like a big end knock
so off to zebra to pinch all the fuel dampers. (some cars have them most dont) Test fit seemed to fix the issueNow had to block some injector holes so could bin the factory rail.
Probably should have driven to the shop and brought proper tapered plugs and tap. but holes were already right size for m12 tap, which i had. can just unscrew them and injectors will fit as normal if
need to at later date. Also block is muddy..Thats the damper thing on top of the banjo fitting. i think it was off a 1gfe! Had to move feed location on rail so cleared plenum ^^^^^^
When was doing this i just happened to blow through one of the fuel regs. yeah you shouldn't be able to do that! wasnt sealing off
This was my 2nd problem having to compensate will too much fuel under high/er boost. the pump could hold pressure at lower load but when fuel demand went up, reg would bypass to much fuel and drop pressure.
i must have picked up a dud reg out of my piles of junk, when originally made the rail for the itb'sSo, 2 weeks later. try tuning it again for the 3rd time??
tune at low boost first. everything working as it should
Turn it up. still works. amazing!
^ These runs are in 3rd gear with 31' tyres. usually see up to 10kw more when run rwd in 1:1 gear. so probs in the 240's if could run in 4th. but thats about 500kph in this thing
pretty good for stock cam engine . will drop the boost back to 1 bar and sort out the lazy boost curve, just wanted to make sure the fueling does what it should.
TL;DR had fueling issues. engine make 236kw on 17psi. still haven't tested airbox
- 21
- 1
-
If you wanted to try something in the meantime, you could take the spacers out of the plenum. Have some thick head flanges cut to space the manifold out at the head end, lengthening the intake runner. Maybe a couple at 25mm so can stack them see what works best. I'm guessing around 50mm would do the trick. Maybe could get them cut from something for some thermal insulation at the same time.
- 1
- 1
-
runner diameter being a bit oversized isn't actually much of an issue. unless its way oversized.
length is probably an issue though.you can see its doing something weird on the dyno sheet, which is most likely the intake runner length. looks like its wanting to work at 8500. which makes the dip at 7500. if the runners were a bit longer (most likely factory length) so it was tuned for 7800-8000rpm would make more power. its something that can be shuffled with the cam timing to a point also. your tuner probably should have already tried that though.
Ideally get those itb's on and make the intake runners way longer. nothing off the shelf will get you there either due to fitment issues, or too hard to make.
- 1
- 1
Roman's 4GR V6 Carina discussion thread
in Project Discussion
Posted
@BiTurbo228 any chance you could do the long rod with the 404gram pistons? sorry thread hijack. I was also most worried about the stock pistons letting go. i think the long rod with lighter aftermarket pistons should be fairly happy.