Jump to content

locost_bryan

Members
  • Posts

    20129
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    65

Posts posted by locost_bryan

  1.  That's a pretty sweet ride. 8)

     

    If I was to keep I would keep as is lower it and get the steel wheels widened

    Formula Fords used the Herald uprights and kept Triumph's oddball 3&3/4" (95.75mm) PCD, so they are a potential source of widened wheels.  Kilroy, the Marina dude from Chch (think he's a member here?), found a set of 7" banded Spitfire steelies ex a FF.

     

    iirc the main problem fitting a 2.5 is squeezing in the "big" Triumph gearbox.  The Vitesse and GT6 used an uprated Herald box (iirc the first of the single-rail type), but it's pretty marginal with the 2 litre (it's also the weak link in the Marina TC).  You'd definitely want to uprate the rear suspension to the late Vitesse/GT6 type.

     

    Uprating the engine to Spitfire 1500/Toledo 1500 TC spec would be a cool option, especially since it keeps it all original looking and no cert required. :-)

    • Like 2
  2. Real nice van. :-)

     

    Someone at Masport must have had fun at the rego office, getting all the J* 780 plates.  Jim Donald's BDA Escort had JD 780, and Blair Robson's had JB 780.

     

    The Holden V6 traces it's roots back to the '60s Buick V6 (via Jeep), which was 3/4's of the 300 V8 that was derived from the Buick 215 (later Rover 3500).  Apparently there are a few Holden seals that fit the Leyland P76.

     

    Buick, Oldsmobile, and Holden all did supercharged or turbocharged versions over it's three decades. :badgrin:

    • Like 2
  3. Always liked the GT6, especially the later ones with the better (less bad?) rear suspension.  Suites the "slot" mags, too. :thumbleft:

     

    The 2.5 should make it go like stink, and the saloon box fixes the GT6's big archilles heel - the "small" Triumph gearbox.  Don't know why Triumph thought the Herald box would handle the torque from the 112bhp six, when it was marginal in the 95bhp Marina TC. :shock:

     

    Plenty of tuning parts around from the TRs, and even with bigger twin carbs and warm cam, the WoF man probably wouldn't know it hasn't got a stock 2-litre. :-P

  4. Shame we couldn't do a deal on these (still keen on the wagon), but I'll leave it up to you to make a good job of these...

     

    I think a Rover V8 conversion into the Wagon would be the way to go - the quintessential British conversion.

    Although a SBC would keep it in the GM family, and replicate the factory's efforts with earlier Victors (iirc). :-)

  5. Don't get me started on Austin Montego's, because the shocking answer is......... I love them!!!!!!!!!

    I drove heaps of them in the Uk because they were worth exactly nothing, and were supercheap to run, especially the diesels.

    If ever I was offered another Diesel Countryman Wagon, I would buy it in a heartbeat ;)

    Like most BL stuff, once the first few thousand buyers had done the final development work, the rest were pretty well sorted.  And the diesels still have a very good reputation in the UK.  Didn't they sell the engine design to Perkins (aka Prima)?

    • Like 1
  6. B series engine with a single HS1 carb

    i can feel the economy from here

    Ah, but any B-series or derivative should bolt in easily.  Keep it period with a twin carb setup from the MG Magnette version for a scorching 72bhp from 1622cc, or drop in a MGB lump for a breathtaking 95bhp from 1800cc, or go the whole hog and screw in a 16-valve 2-litre turbo M-series from a Rover Tomcat :badgrin: .

    • Like 2
  7. thanks boe, offer noted! may need your help drinking some mooses at the warming.

     

     

    just reading back over what you wrote elliot, one thing i've found through this project is noone knows fuck all about containers, except the dude in HiVis who cuts them up all day.

     

    seriously, i couldnt find any useful information through anyone that has any decent qualification.

    all the critical information and seriously important points came from the guys in the yard.

     

    the engineers drew it as a tin box, didnt even know there were channel rails, offsets, major structural parts in places.

    i wish i'd designed certain parts, the foundation attachment in particular, with the yard boys and got them checked by engineers rather than getting to engineers to go from scratch.

     

    Container houses are wickedly cool, the ideal "green" building imho.  :thumbleft:

     

    Cubular in Tauranga reckon $2200-2900/m2 ready to go...

    http://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/business/the-rebuild/10157148/Life-in-a-container-house

     

    iirc Graeme Addis does container buildings http://www.addis.co.nz/container-innovation

    and built this ...

     

    ferrari_festival_at_hampton_downs_63.jpgferrari_festival_at_hampton_downs_26.jpg

    • Like 2
  8. 302 2v is probably cleveland?

     

    my limited knowledge of fords is that the 2v and 4v were the different heads for the cleveland motor small port and big port.

    there is definitely such thing as a cleveland 302 anyway.

     

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_Mustang_(first_generation)#1971.E2.80.931973

     

     

    1973

    250 cu in (4.1 L) Thriftpower I6, 1-barrel Carter RBS, L-code, 98 bhp (73 kW; 99 PS) @ 3,400, 197 lb·ft (267 N·m) @ 1,600

    302 cu in (4.9 L) Windsor V8, 2-barrel Autolite 2100, F-code, 140 bhp (104 kW; 142 PS) @ 4,000, 239 lb·ft (324 N·m) @ 2,000

    351 cu in (5.8 L) Cleveland V8, 2-barrel Autolite 2100, H-code, 177 bhp (132 kW; 179 PS) @ 4,000, 284 lb·ft (385 N·m) @ 2,000

    351 cu in (5.8 L) Cleveland V8, 4-barrel Autolite 4300D, Q-code, 266 bhp (198 kW; 270 PS) @ 5,400, 301 lb·ft (408 N·m) @ 3,600

     

    • Like 1
  9. Can't say I like anything about the new Transit vans :( Supposed to drive really well etc. but just look like a big Focus to me.......

     

    Only got a rear 3/4 view of the new Transit Custom - from that angle, with the bigger rubber, had a similar stance and proportions to the early Transit.  Not so from the front, as you say, too much of the Ford "family" look and not enough of the Transit's traditional character.

  10. Leads to me recalling the (bad) old days of rebuilding a Chevette 1256 in the bedroom of the flat I was living in. Apart from never staying in tune (electronic ignition should help that) it went OK.

     

    Took SWMBO's Chevette on our honeymoon back in '89 - drove from Christchurch to the Bay of Islands, great wee beast, would sit flat at 115kmh on all but the windiest roads. :thumbleft:

     

    Nice short-throw gearlever, neutral handling, just needed another 60bhp... :-P

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...