Jump to content

Positive Ape

Members
  • Posts

    847
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Positive Ape

  1. I agree that imperial sucks. 

    but I went through a phase of calling a standard piece of framing timber "90x45" and it just became cumbersome. 4 x 2 is easy to say and it works.

    I guess you have a point about 2 x 3.5 though!

  2. What about those 2.3 litre Transit motors that used to go in these?

    I'm not sure, were they the V4 motors?

    Many moons ago I was a passenger in a 2.3 litre Viva and it was a riot - oh hang on, I drove it too. After that I was dead keen on that engine swap.

     

    Otherwise, why not just chuck some cheap/secondhand parts at your current motor then fit one of those aliexpress superchargers that everyone is fizzing over in the Tech thread?

  3. I found the pics for this roller skate in a long-lost folder so I thought I would do a bit of a write -up in this long-lost thread

    1990 Peugeot 205 GTi

     

    DSCN0765.JPG.fbc779d481fb1c5973d3ce7cb9dc186d.JPG

     

    The good

    Man this thing really handled. I have never driven a car before or since that was so controllable with the throttle. When you planted it mid-corner it would tighten its line and dive for the apex which was so fun. It seemed to get even better with a bit of weight in the boot and I had one memorable drive around western lake fully loaded with household effects - good times.

    Torque. 1.9 litre engine so it pulled well and was stress-free up hills.

    Styling. It looked cool, and I loved those 15 inch alloy wheels

     

    The bad

    Pretty much everything else. Engine was reluctant to rev and not at all sporty. (<- disclaimer: this car was a japanese import so lower compression. UK spec might be better)

    Interior rattled like it was going to fall apart at any moment

    Brakes were nothing special

    Steering was heavy (non power steer)

    Under bonnet looked like a dogs breakfast (I'm spoiled by jap twin cams I guess)

     

    Conclusion

    Overrated. Other cars go harder and handle almost as well.

    DSCN0764.JPG

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
  4. IMHO older vehicle owners either like cheap motoring or they like to be special.

    I'm a cheapo, so I like cars that cost a few grand or less and allow for some DiY input. This means older vehicles appeal to me. Not cos they are "classic" in terms of design, performance, or whatever

    The other group buy the real classics. Beautiful/fast/unique vehicles that make other people envious.

    Sweet, I'm quite happy with that definition. ^^^

    Consequently... a Tiida ain't gonna be classic but some poor sod such as myself will still be welding them up and tracking down NOS Tiida parts 20 years from now

    • Like 5
  5. My friend, who is a mechanic with 25 years experience, went with a D-Max

    Salient points that I remember from an avalanche of information about work utes...

    - Dmax engine is a proven design, been in production for 10 years. Everything that breaks has been sorted out

    - Transmission is a proper 4 x 4 unit, not that Tremec 6 speed that goes in to Colorados (Commodore tranny). However, he said that the very latest D-Maxes are 6 speed so this may no longer apply.

    -A D-Max is a lot cheaper than a landcruiser.

    - Plastic shit is all the same. He said that one manufacturer's bits of plastic were the same as another

    • Like 2
  6. urgggg, it's going to be a thrice weekly commuter? Nah. I doubt it would be cheaper than the commodore when you factor in the usual second-hand car issues and supercharged fuel consumption. It probably runs on 95 or 98 octane to make it even worse

  7. fast / cheap to own / cheap to buy    <---- pick any two

     

     

    does that even work?  I'm thinking of how commmodores and falcons are pretty fast but their fuel consumption around town puts me off.

     

    and turbocharged vehicles require more maintenance

     

    And the hot hatches which I prefer aren't really fast. They are fun, but not really fast.

     

    Late model euro might be alright if you work on them yourself and order parts online. My cousin once borrowed one of these

     

    536238768.jpg

     

     

    off the lot and it was EPIC! 4.1 litre twin turbo V8 diesel with 650Nm. For $40,000 its cheaper and (IMHO) not as "guns and ammo" as a new ute .

     

    But not really what this thread is about, so I would go for this

     

    520342956.jpg

     

    turbo Saab. but auto  :-(  (it's a hard road finding the perfect car)

  8. I agree with Brockzila. My Dad has a 2012 Cerato and it isn't very friendly to tall drivers. Seems like a good car otherwise.

     

    In Korea climatic conditions can be brutal and servicing is haphazard so I've always respected the ability of Korean cars to keep going. Shit, I've seen a traffic jam that stretches for over 150km, with 34 degrees and 90% humidity showing on the weather forecast. Traffic is stop-start crawling for 6 hours with the air con blasting and even the shitty 90s Sonatas and Avantis (Elantra) don't break down.

    • Like 1
  9. u41fkpk0.2oj.jpg



    1993 Honda Accord SiR

     

    Don't be fooled by these things, there ain't much SiR about them except the engine. Aside from that they are a quality vehicle that will transport you in comfort for many thousands of kilometres.

     

     

    Good things

     

    Full fat H22a vtec motor. Poooo-baaaaaa and all that. Within a narrow rev range (about 6000 to 7400 from memory) this is gods own 4 cylinder engine. Below 4000 it's flat as a pancake. 4000 to 6000 it's like any other donk

     

    Climate air, cruise control

     

    Nice styling. The SiRs come with a subtle bodykit that looks really good. The basic vehicle is a decent looker anyway so it adds up to a good looking car

     

    Huge boot and good interior space

     

    It'll pull 2.5 tonnes up a hill on a dirt road. TBH I only did this once and I was shitting bricks. 2+ tonne of clay soil on a hire trailer, pulled a couple of kays to the tip then up to the clean-fill area. Probably more of a tribute to the tow bar than the car but I was impressed all the same

     

     

    Bad things

     

    fuel consumption nothing special. about 10 litres per 100k around town, 8-9 on the open road (mine had an auto trans)

     

    handling is pretty shite. Mine was possibly rooted suspension-wise but it was an awful understeerer. Perhaps that's why flat peakers lower them - to get them to go where they are pointed

     

     

    That's it really.

    • Like 1
  10. Cheers K-trips, I adjusted the clutch according to my Haynes manual and reverse is no longer an issue... but now it has a random problem where the clutch won't engage.

     

    So far it has only happened when I have driven out out of the gate from work and then stopped to check my phone (twice in the last week). Suddenly the clutch pedal will go to the floor without engaging. Then, just as quickly, it comes right again and I can drive away as per normal. Any ideas?

×
×
  • Create New...