Jump to content

sr2

Members
  • Posts

    763
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by sr2

  1. 14 hours ago, RXFORD said:

    You sure thats cu/ni tube? Could just be the pics but looks too coppery. Cu/ni is more dull gold and will have markings to confirm what it is. Where did you get it from?

     

    It is definitely copper nickel not copper. The copper look is just a coating, I like the look but you have to be careful not to scratch through it when bending or flaring. I bought it from a wholesaler in Australia.

  2. On 13/09/2022 at 09:21, cletus said:

    Blast cabinet is cheap, but the compressor you need to run one efficiently is not so cheap. Also sandblasting something like a wheel takes longer than you think

    So, if you think you will be doing a reasonable amount of blasting, might be worthwhile buying one, but if it's just a one off, better to pay someone to do it IMO  

     

    I have a blaster, and a set of wheels to get blasted, and I'll probably still pay someone else to do those...

    LOL, have to agree with cletus for once, he's making a lot sense :thumbright:. I've got one of the better single phase compressors I could find and an ok blast cabinet (although after reading the sandblaster thread I have a few mod's in mind!). 

    It's handy for smaller blasting jobs (e.g. manifolds) but I wouldn't attempt one steel wheel that alone 4. I couldn't agree more that it's a job that needs to be outsourced.

    • Like 3
  3. Hi, a couple of points here. Absolutely nothing wrong with brass re-sleeving , the main reason it's gone out of favour is that the amount of specialist skills (and man hours) required to machine to an interference fit  is far more than what is required to machine to a "slopping good fit" and then glue in a stainless sleeve. Remember neither brass or s/s corrodes.

    I'm not sure where the "Brass or copper tend to be too soft and oval out which causes it not to return" comes from - I've never seen any hydraulic cylinder re-sleeved in copper? and in all the years I spent working in the brake remanufacturing industry's heydays I never struck a stuck piston caused by oval wear? Yes brass can wear more than s/s but it responds far better to a good hone than s/s ever will, if I'm working on an elderly ride I'm always pleased when I find a brass re-sleeve.

    The same old rules apply. Most brake issues are caused by failing to replace fluid on a regular basis; brake fluid is hygroscopic encouraging corrosion and it also degrades when subjected to high temperatures - there's a good reason why we replace brake fluid after a days racing!

    Hope this helps and yes I have a soft spot foe Morries. :thumbright:

     

    • Like 1
  4. On 08/09/2022 at 15:20, moparmuppet said:

    Is cold rolled steel easy to get hold of?  I have only ever used zintec but it hasn't been a hassle and the offcuts aren't rusty years later.

    After decades of body and chassis repairs I'm still a huge Zintec fan. Untreated steel begins to rust the second it's exposed to the atmosphere and has to be ground/linished before you weld it where as Zintec is great to weld.

    Re repair panel gauge (i.e. thickness), with anything structural avoid using steel that is thicker than the steel you're replacing. The added rigidity of thicker material will only put more loading on both the welds and the surrounding original metal increasing the likelihood of stress fractures.

    • Like 1
  5. I bought a cheap on one Bangood some years back and wouldn't be without it.

    It's surprisingly accurate for the price and most of the time you're looking at comparative temperatures like top/bottom radiator hoses or exhaust headers.

    It's saved a a fortune on  brake indicator (thermochromic ) paint on the race car and most importantly is very handy when brewing beer! 

    • Like 3
  6. A bit of a slow week stuck at home isolating with the bloody ‘rona and lacking motivation.

    Managed to finish off mounting the brake plumbing.

     

    714R.JPG.0d05b5a86b8edf9012a4fa49637af06b.JPG

     

     

    715R.JPG.5da49312a14ed80e321283974af33e8f.JPG

     

    I’ve been taking second glances at the front sway-bar setup, the top mount of the dropper arm is shared by the front bumper mounts and it’s not ideal as there is some movement there when the suspension is working. In its defense the setup has covered literally hundreds of thousands of km and it’s easy to forget I made this stuff in the early 80’s with only rudimentary hand tools.

     

     

    716R.JPG.e47ca783ec746504acf5efd1c2a50df7.JPG

     

     

     

    Long term plan once Rigamortice is back on the road is to put some of my race car suspension tuning experience toward seeing how well I can get the old girl to go around corners – could be a bit of a laugh on a good bit of open road! I’ll probably need the sway bar to be adjustable so the big question is do I do it now?

    Mounted the front grill surround to check how much room I’ll have to play with having lowered the front end – still no clearance issues I can see.

     

     

    717R.JPG.7658d078e957e09dc2e8a1d8bb6a4d97.JPG

     

    The radiator is in pretty bad shape and I haven’t a clue what car it originally came from.

     

     

    718R.JPG.4f628c084632172b4b7426265c6e9fb9.JPG

     

     

    Anyone with any ideas of where I can find a 400mm x 600mm radiator please let me know, I’d prefer something old-school as plan B (fabricated aluminum) could look out of place.

     

    https://oldschool.co.nz/index.php?/topic/49843-sr2%E2%80%99s-1947-vauxhall-%E2%80%9Crigamortice%E2%80%9D-discussion-thread/

     

    • Like 7
  7. On 05/08/2022 at 21:17, NickJ said:

    Chuck a dowel and run the dti top and bottom, be interesting to qualify how terrible, i'd wager they are pretty good or so terrible they'll go straight in the bin

    Sorry for the delay in replying, too many work commitments and too many projects.

    Haven't got a ground dowel to measure runout accurately but have done some trial runs comparing width of cut to diameter of end mill. Hard to quantify in figures but I'd give the set only a 6.5 out of 10 - a good start i.e. adequate for fabrication but not up to more accurate machining.  I'll invest in better when funds and needs apply.

    • Like 1
  8. 10 hours ago, Nominal said:

    The shop told me they had an old fart come in to consult on it and he said they were a pain. I want to keep the car original if at all possible, a new system would require a cert too. Will ping you if I need advice.

    LOL, I suspect I might be classified as being an "old fart"!

    Nothing wrong with keeping things original, tidy HG's are getting thin on the ground theses days. I've never seen a new booster install from that era needing a cert, the aussie stuff was pretty generic.

    • Thanks 1
  9. On 30/07/2022 at 17:30, Nominal said:

    It's a journey.

    I blew a rear slave cylinder out back in late Feb, and since I was having to work on the rear brakes I thought it was time to get the booster/MC rebuilt, it's just over 50 years old and never been off the car (I'm pretty sure). The front calipers were rebuilt last year.

    I took the lot into the brake shop (ABC). They supplied new rear shoes and the slave cylinders easily enough but then took ages to get the booster done. They told me that the were having trouble getting the booster to hold vacuum when reassembled. Eventually they got it to work after replacing (one, both?) diaphragm. (I dunno I thought I was paying them to do that anyway). Instead of rebuilding the original big nut M/C they supplied a new pattern part with an alloy body. They also stripped down the brake warning switch/slider part and put new seals in it.

    When I put it all back together initially I couldn't get the warning switch slider to reset properly. Later on I've worked out that the pin on the end of the switch is too short so the warning light never actually goes out no matter where the piston is.

    I took it for a drive up the road but the brakes weren't right, quite grabby at the front (discs) and still felt like the rears weren't working (too much pedal travel). I wasn't even sure that the replaced M/C had the same pipe arrangement, in the stock setup the rear part of the M/C goes to the rear brakes.

    So I sent the original M/C down to the place in Christchurch who rebuilt it. Thought I'd be sweet, but no. I couldn't get the rear brakes to bleed properly. Eventually I disconnected everything from the rear and just put a return pipe from the rear port back into the M/C, when pushing the brake pedal almost no fluid was coming out the rear port. So I sent the M/C back to Chch to be checked. They sent it back with no notes so I don't know if there was an issue or not.

    I've made a rig to bench test the M/C and it seemed to be working OK, but when I put it back on the booster the pedal travel was massive so pulled it off again.

    So after that I had a measure up and worked out that there is about a 15mm gap between the end of the pushrod out of the booster and the push point inside the M/C. Looking into the booster I couldn't really see if the reaction disc was in there (I've done a bit more googling of how boosters work) There didn't seem to be anything loose inside the booster.

    So, I took the booster and the M/C back to ABC on Monday for them to have a look. I showed them the issue but I haven't heard anything from them. There must be something wrong inside the booster but I don't know what. I did have a go at splitting it, but gave up as the force I was applying seemed excessive. 

     

     

    20220307_211448.jpg

    20220624_094507.jpg

     

    LOL, I have to confess I haven’t had one of those in bits for a long, long time. Even when all the internal parts were available new they were pricks of things to work on. The two piece Bakelite valve body had a habit of breaking when you unscrewed them and it was often a mission to get them to hold a vacuum when reassembled. As a rule of thumb if an earlier style tandem PBR Mastervac is is working and most importantly dry inside all I would do is replace the output shaft seal & lubricate, replace the foam air filter and lubricate the input seal. In their defence they were reliable as long as the master cylinder didn’t dump brake fluid into them.

    Yes the cans are hard to separate, even with a jig it’s quite easy to bend the studs or even rip them out. The trick is to work your way around the lip with a small pry bar to break the seal, even then the diaphragm rubber sticks to the steel can like s*** to a blanket!

    Another option is to bite the bullet and spend around $500 AU on ebay and buy a new aftermarket booster/master cylinder assembly.

    https://www.ebay.com/itm/222137052973

    I think Flash bought something similar for his Mustang, could be worth contacting him re the supplier.

    With rear brakes I never trust the self-adjusters, a little extra effort when assembling often avoids excessive pedal travel issues. It’s also important to radius the shoes to fit the drums.

    Feel free to PM me if there’s anything I can do to help.

    • Like 1
  10. Thought I’d revisit the gearbox mount for a change of scenery. Big thanks to Oldschool member ‘Big Harry’ for pointing out there was a difference in the Toyota cross members used with W40 and W50 boxes, the collective depth of information in this forum rocks!

     

    Problem is my dummy engine block/trans used a W40 and I was planning on running a W50…bugger!

     

    After considerable measuring, head scratching and a few Wild Turkeys I figured out there was only 10 mm difference but the extra gear in the W50 meant the cross member I’d made would not clear the gearbox.

     

    634R.jpg.db0cd8d9b84006db2ecf1beece8abf2d.jpg

     

     

    As much as I hate hacking into something I thought was finished you sometimes need to grit your teeth and fire up the angle grinder to make it work.

     

    635R.jpg.7cae90d4b9e34bcabee6f069f06a91b2.jpg

     

    636R.jpg.7723ebd0c9ac0695f5adeba3efc4a026.jpg

     

     

    Added some gussets and repainted – sorry I didn’t take more photos.

     

    635R.jpg.814fd383af4e77cd890a487f2b692264.jpg

     

     

    • Like 9
×
×
  • Create New...