Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

going to EFI on the triumph. next up is the fuel system

I see there are arrangements which cap the return on the fuel rail, and the fuel pressure regulator is located way back at the outlet of the fuel pump and does everything from there. seems like a simple and easy way to setup a "return" system without meters of hard pipe. but conspicuously the OEM doesn't do it, so what's the story?

Posted

corvette combined FPR and filter was all the rage for engine swaps 5-10years ago. dont need a regualtor on the rail, or a return

  • Like 3
Posted
3 minutes ago, tortron said:

corvette combined FPR and filter was all the rage for engine swaps 5-10years ago. dont need a regualtor on the rail, or a return

yeah I think that's the thingy I'm looking at, reasonably priced too. Are there any downsides for a non bleeding edge application? 

Posted

I have seen it done with a normal aftermarket reg with a tee going to the rail between the pump and the reg, it worked for the burnout the car did. Don't know if they kept it as a permanent solution

Posted

looks like it's a somewhat common thing now, I make no apologies for being stuck in 1993. but yes looks like I'll go with a nonreturn system to save the extra plumbing

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...