Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 7 months later...
  • Replies 102
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
11 hours ago, kws said:

It'd been an interesting month or so since I sold the Alto, trying to work out what on earth my next project would be. Finally, It fell into my lap.

I knew the criteria. There were a few reasons to sell the Alto, and one of them was to experience a new platform on the track. I felt I had reached the limits of what that car could do without dumping a bunch of money into it for bigger turbos, new wheels and tires etc.

This meant I was looking to move away from FWD and get a RWD or AWD car. Being manual was non-negotiable. The other goal was to try and reduce the amount of money I had tied up in the Alto. That last one was actually much harder than I expected as all the "fun" cars had "fun" tax on them.

My options were really limited; An MX5, an Altezza or some sort of Subaru. Nothing else really fit the price range. So that's where I started.

In terms of Subarus, I tried to avoid pre-Y2K as older than that involves 6 monthly WOFs, and I can't be bothered with that, so that left with me Legacys or bug-eye onwards Impreza. Anything STI was out of the question, I couldn't afford that performance, but it still had to be a turbo. The options for WRXs were limited. There were a few bug and blob WRXs floating around for a good price, but they all carried huge Ks (usually around 300,000km) with questionable histories and modifications. I didn't want to buy a time bomb.

2001-subaru-impreza-wrx-s-2.avif

The uncertainty around these led me to look at the newer hatchback style Impreza, as they still came in turbo options, manual, AWD, and usually with lower Ks as they were newer.

My wife and I did a couple hour round trip to look at the first one. A black 2007 Impreza S-GT, the JDM narrow-body WRX.

spec_6664331c-b962-4b80-adba-29b830729f2

It'd been for sale for a while, and the seller did advise that the last WOF had a note for underbody rust on the rear subframe, but otherwise the car was "all good". The rust wasn't too much of a worry as long as the rest of the body was solid, as I could wire brush and treat the subframe.

This car looked good from a distance, but as I walked toward it (from the rear), I immediately noticed really bad "orange peel" in the rear quarter panel. Being in the industry and having seen it all, this put me on alert straight away. The more I looked, the worse it was. Rust bubbling in the roof gutter at the rear, bad paintwork, rust starting on the boot floor where the rear panel had been cut off and replaced (along with a tell tail paint pen "cut" line). The seller told us "oh yeah it had a small nudge in traffic a couple of years ago". Yeah, his definition of "small nudge" might differ from mine, when it appears the whole rear end had been cut off and rebuilt. It probably wouldn't be an issue for most people, but it would always bother me.

I took it for a quick drive anyway to see if it was worth the effort to fix it up, but although the 260hp and AWD felt nice, it just didnt really inspire me. The price was also too high considering the issues. I walked away.

Next was a New Zealand new version of the same car, a 2009 WRX, also in black. Long story short, this too had been in a rear shunt, with a misaligned tailgate, both rear quarters had been repainted, and there was a lovely patch of cracking bog above the rear wheel, with rust bleeding stains under it. I didn't even drive this one, I just thanked her for her time and left.

As a change of scenery, I had been watch a listing for a 1993 WRX "Version 1" but hadn't been able to get in touch with the seller before someone else bought it. This was an exception to the rule, I love these old GC8s but the prices are getting insane, so when it was relisted a little further up the coast for a similar price, I jumped to contact the seller.

IMG_0027-1-1024x577.jpg

Already alarm bells are ringing, why is he selling it so soon? He spun a story about needing the funds, but in truth I think he bought it without inspecting it and got stung and needed to offload it quickly.

One day after work I drove up the coast and went to view the car. I knew from the previous seller that there was some rust, and he had provided a couple of photos showing it was in the top of the front guard and in the rear door, both replacable panels, but he hadnt supplied photos of the rust in the boot he mentioned.

Viewing the car, the rust was far more extensive. In a quick look, I found a rust bubble in the front chassis rail, rust bubbling along the top edge of the rear guard, and worst of all, the seller pointed out the rust in the boot; basically the whole rain channel under the rear glass, on both sides where the hinges are, was made of bog. Cracking, badly painted and rusty bog. When I mentioned "heck, I didn't think it'd be that bad", the seller replied "neither did I". Ouch. I walked at that point, you'd need to either reshell that car, or gut it and spend months cutting all the rust out and rebuilding it.

The final Subaru I looked at was another NZDM WRX hatch, this time in silver.

tcwrx-1.thumbnail.avif

Much to my surprise, this one had also been crashed. I knew it was rough, and had a couple of dings, but it was priced well, so I could've overlooked those, but this one had a new curveball, rust. It wasnt huge, but there were definitely rust bubbles down the LH A-Pillar by the glass, and at the top of the hatch opening where the hinges are that someone had tried to paint over. When asking about things like cambelt and service history I got a lot of blank looks, so that didn't bode well.

I took it for a quick drive to see how it went and it was fairly disappointing. The clutch feel was horrible, and the brakes had a massive shudder, so work was obviously needed in those places too.

I'm quickly finding out that these WRXs were often bought by families and are just "a car", with little care given to what they are or how to properly look after them. It's a shame.

So, whats next? The old Toyota Altezza was in the price range, and with 200hp on tap with a 6 speed manual and torsen LSD, they should be fairly fun. I've owned one before, and although it was a nice car to drive, it always felt a bit underpowered for the body, and wasnt that exciting. This lead me to consider a couple, but not bother looking at any.

DSC00883-1024x680.jpg

Finally, it was MX5s. I looked at three. I'll start with the one I walked away from as soon as I started it up; an ND1.

2183408349-1024x768.jpg 2183407950-1024x768.jpg

It's a gorgeous car, and even the massive stupid wing didn't look too bad in photos (although in person it looked 100x bigger). This had some seriously questionable mods though, one of which was a painted on Union Jack on the soft top (why). The worst though was the exhaust, which I don't think had anything resembling a muffler. I got in, pressed the start button and was immediately greeted by the loudest car I have ever been in. My wife was standing just outside the open door, and I couldn't hear her talking to me over the exhaust.

That exhaust, and the fact that the car was so small and cramped for my rather generous frame, meant that I had to walk away.

That left me with a pair of NCs. I've also previously owned an NC, and really enjoyed it, so knew one would go well as a track car.

20160430_153107-resized-1280-2-1024x491.

Turners Damaged Auctions was the location of the first one, an early NC1 RS soft top. It had high Ks, appeared to have been sitting outside for ages, had some cosmetic issues, but otherwise if it went cheap enough I was prepared to fix it up and thrash the pants off it. Even if the engine was bad, I had planned to 2.5 swap it.

I went and viewed the car, since by some miracle it was at the local yard

20250310_113543-1024x768.jpg

Externally, it didn't look too bad. The brown soft top needed some love, there was a ding in the RH rear arch, and the front bumper was... trash. The inside was pretty good too. Some wear, but with over 200,000km on it, it's to be expected. It also had a broken front quarter window.

20250310_113311-1024x768.jpg

The underside is where it got a bit iffy.

20250310_112702-1024x768.jpg 20250310_112824-1024x768.jpg

It all appeared to be surface rust, but there would be a few hours worth of work under there scrubbing it with a wire wheel and then treating and painting it.

The auction rolled around, and with a fixed price limit in my mind, I was ready to hit the bid button. The bidding started and ended about a grand higher than my limit, so it wasn't to be.

Interestingly about a week later it popped up on Facebook with a new reg and wof, a repainted front bumper, replaced window and dyed soft top for significantly more than he paid. Can't argue with the hustle, at least he did some work to fix it, but I can't help but wonder how much work he put into the underside, or if he just blasted paint right on over the rust.

Finally, the last NC I looked at was a PRHT NC1 at the infamous "shite car dumping ground" dealer

2195259580-1024x768.jpg 2195259625-1024x768.jpg

Everything about it was right. The colour, the spec, the power hard top, manual, LSD, cloth interior, and something like 130,000km. I jumped at the chance to view it bright and early the next morning.

They had it parked out front and center, where it was catching some attention, paint shining in the sun. After a good look around, issues were coming to light. The term "polished turd" was coming to mind. The tires, although good Michelins, were about 10 years old and hard as plastic. The engine was weeping oil in a couple of places under all the dealer spec shiny slime, and there was an excessive amount of wear in the interior for the Ks; it was ageing worse than both my old one and the Turners one above, which both had over 200,000km on them.

2195259638-1024x768.jpg

I jumped in and took it for a drive anyway, as I can fix all of that, for a price. The drive showed me three things; I like NCs a lot. The thermostat was stuck open so it never came to temp, and the rear shocks were poked. The slightest bump would have the rear of the car slamming violently down onto its bump stops. Horrible. I had the same issue with my old NC, and spent a not-insignificant amount to fit a pair of new shocks to fix it.

Pulling back in, the salesman comes up, beeming, practically rubbing his hands together after running them through his slicked back hair. His face dropped when I said its got a couple of serious issues, the thermostat is stuck open, the rear shocks are stuffed and the tires are borderline dangerous, would he work with me on a better price? "The boss drills into us every Monday not to drop prices" is what I got told. They "might" take it to a workshop and have them "look" at the thermostat and shocks, but I wouldnt count on either of them being fixed properly, if they even acknowdleged there was an issue. It's no wonder they're (proudly) sitting on a massive inventory of cars that never seem to sell.

I decided to leave it at that point. The price was too high, they were asking a premium price for a car that needed some significant work. If they would've worked with me to drop the price a grand or two, it would probably be in my driveway.

After viewing the other hunks of junk in the mean time, I actually went back to the dealer the other weekend, a couple of weeks after first seeing the car, with the full intention of dropping the asking price on it and driving away as it is. This time it was in their shed, under the artificial lighting. The more I looked at it, the worse it looked. The paint was fading and peeling in places, and it just didnt have that shine from last time. With a heavy heart, I walked away again.

Now, there is one other car that fits the criteria almost to a T. The Toybaru twins; the Toyota GT86 and Subaru BRZ. I had been writing these off as the prices were just too high. I couldn't justify dropping $16-17K on a high KM one. The autos were cheaper, but stuff that.

DABCEA88-5C82-4AFF-8E39-DBF021980222_0.j

These guys have the concept right. Modern, light weight (just over 1200kg), RWD, Manual, and a responsive 2L flat four "Boxer" engine. They were a collaboration between Toyota and Subaru. Both cars share the same basic shell, driveline and interior, but the differnet brands gave them different faces and trim levels. The BRZ is generally considered a bit more upmarket than the 86.

So, the other day whilst flicking through Marketplace, wading through all the trash, I spot a new listing for a 2012 BRZ. Oh, it's manual. Price is pretty decent too; a bit lower than usual.

490467088_1994824547713156_6698680027182

Within a couple of hours of it being listed, I had interrogated the seller, got sent a bunch more photos, and made a slightly silly offer, which had been accepted.

The seller was really upfront. It has 190,000km on the clock, so its lived a life and has some marks to tell it, but he sent me photos of every little mark inside and out. Anything I asked, he tried his best to answer.

A couple of days later, where I lived in a constant state of "he's going to sell it out from under me", he met me in the agreed town, about half way between where he and I lived. I look over it, take it for a quick drive, and deals done. We wait about... 2 hours for the bank to transfer the cash, and then we're off home.

20250412_103444-1024x576.jpg Sitting waiting for funds to clear...

The two hour drive home was interesting. I quickly learnt the car had some flaws. The most obvious one was that the JDM stereo was still installed and I had no idea how to connect my phone to it. Que two hours of jamming to the Japanese pop music that I found stored on the headunit internal hard drive. I got a couple of interesting looks gound through the small towns, cranking that, arm out the open window...

488192502_649541954533068_75398544810808

The other big issue was the throttle response and clutch control was terrible. Taking off from intersections resulted in either bunnyhopping away, or nearly stalling it as the throttle did nothing. I got a bit more used to driving around it, but it wasnt that much fun.

I'm also forgetting that the car came fitted with a lovely sickly sweet air freshener in the cup holder, which got so strong and unpleasant I considered throwing it from the moving car to get rid of it, but in the end I handed it to someone to throw in the bin at the next stop.

Oh, and the last surprise was that the car has a pretty bad shake when travelling over 100kph. I'm hoping this is the mismatched cheap ditchfinders that are currently fitted.

Anyway, I made it safely home and although I was off to a bit of a rocky start to the relationship, I still enjoyed the drive back. It was a very pleasant car to drive.

If I were a Youtuber, I'd say something like - I BOUGHT THE CHEAPEST MANUAL BRZ IN THE COUNTRY. But I'm not, so... yeah, I did though.

It was fithly, but I couldnt help myself from stopping and grabbing some photos.

20250412_153321-1024x677.jpg 20250412_153343-1024x684.jpg 20250412_153404-1024x604.jpg 20250412_153435-1024x768.jpg 20250412_153458-1024x768.jpg

Being an S trim level, the highest in this model, I also ended up with some goodies like dual zone climate

20250412_180101-1024x768.jpg

and heated half leather seats

20250412_180109-1024x768.jpg

Along with red stitched leather padding around the place.

A previous owner had ticked a couple of boxes too, which left me with an STI skirt kit (except the front lip which has been replaced with a knockoff due to an incident with a possum), LED "dayliner" DRLs, the red STI start button and the previous owner added the rear spoiler with STI gurney flap.

20250412_153412-1024x638.jpg 20250412_153558-1024x768.jpg

Over all, its a stunningly good looking car. The World Rally Blue paint and STI skirts are what really tipped me over to buying this one. All the others that were on the market tend to be black, white or the odd red one. I'm also a fan of it being the Subaru variant as I feel its the most true to its heart; the boxer engine.

So yes, thats the new toy. I have a big list of things that need doing, and before doing any actual "upgrades" I really want to get on the track and get a baseline first, so I know what to improve on.

My folks owned a base spec 86 from new having ordered and paid a deposit before there were any in the country. They owned it for ~10 years and only lost just over $10K on it.

One upgrade from basic yours will have will be the digital readout for the speedo? Basic spec analogue speedo felt tricky to keep to 50km/h without cruise control.

  • Like 2
Posted
6 hours ago, Willdat? said:

My folks owned a base spec 86 from new having ordered and paid a deposit before there were any in the country. They owned it for ~10 years and only lost just over $10K on it.

One upgrade from basic yours will have will be the digital readout for the speedo? Basic spec analogue speedo felt tricky to keep to 50km/h without cruise control.

Thankfully yes, this has a digital speedo. I can't imagine having to live with just the analogue one, the scale is so cooked that it goes to 260kph and 50kph is a twitch of the needle from zero. Apparently these have a 180kph speed limiter anyway, so what sick joke is the speedo going that high?

20250413_174250.jpg

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Having arrived home with the new car the day before, I took no time at all to start ripping the car to bits.

The first thing to fix was going to be the head unit. I had previously purchased another of the cheap Android units from AliExpress, the same I had used in the Alto, in preparation to fit it in my next car, so once I bought the relevant wiring and fascia adaptors, I was ready to get stuck in.

I started by removing the surrounding trim, which came free by hand

20250413_125044-1024x768.jpg

Where I immediately came across my first problem. Being the stock head unit, it still had the stupid security screws fitted. As if anyone wants to steal a stock head unit that badly.

20250413_125224-1024x768.jpg

Nothing a garage full of tools can't fix though. A small bolt extractor was the perfect solution

20250413_125421-1024x852.jpg

Upon removing the unit, I was greeted by the obligatory JDM nest of wiring behind the head unit

20250413_125748-1024x768.jpg

20250413_130036-1024x768.jpg

It took a lot of work to unpick all the wiring and dump what wasn't needed

20250413_131916-1024x768.jpg

20250413_131926-1024x768.jpg

All the black wires with the square plugs are for various antennas around the car, which would require a lot more disassembly than I can be bothered with, so they were bundled up, taped up and zip tied out of the way. This left with me with the two main connectors, the FM antenna harness (with adaptor) and a 5 pin connector which has the reverse camera trigger on it.

20250413_135901-1024x768.jpg

As a side note, the wiring adaptor required is for a Toyota, showing the car's shared roots. In NZ it's an Aerpro APP0141

20250413_174836.jpg

I also needed some little filler plates for either side, since the standard head unit is wider than a normal Din unit. These were Aerpro ATB2

Along with all the wiring for the head unit, there was also wiring for the ETC unit in the glove box, which all had to come out. This turned out to run all along the dash, to under the steering wheel

20250413_123709-1024x768.jpg

Where I also found this weird bundle of wires with heaps of unused bullet terminals

20250413_124535-1024x768.jpg

As it turns out, this is actually a genuine accessory. Part number H0077AL000 - Option Harness, which ties into the car harness and gives a bunch of "outs" to use for various things

Screenshot_20250418_102140_Google.jpg

20250413_134559-1024x768.jpg

It appears the DRLs tie into it, as does the ETC unit and reversing camera trigger. Very handy!

Anyway, back to the head unit. This is where it all started to turn a bit pear shaped.

The Android unit is very shallow, so the brackets need mounting holes quite far forward (an issue I had in the Alto), but putting the two side by side looked like I should be good

20250413_140302-1024x768.jpg

The filler plates needed some modifying to clear the mounting brackets. I had to cut a lot more out of these later on

20250413_141956-1024x768.jpg

A quick test fit in the surround. It's VERY tight, I suspect the Android unit might be a fraction taller than the Din standard.

20250413_143005-1024x768.jpg

I cut the ISO plugs off the adaptor harness, and wired it to the head unit wiring, ready for a test boot

20250413_151011-1024x768.jpg

Excellent, everything seemed to be working. So now it should just be as easy and screwing it in and pushing the surround on over it, right? No.

This part of the job took the longest. In the end I had to file the mounting holes on each bracket into slots, so I could lower the head unit down as it mounted too high and clashed with the dash, and finally it took me a while to realise the filler pieces needed to be moved backwards a hole, and can't mount flush with the unit otherwise they actually try to share space with the surround, which is no good. This took a horrible amount of test fitting, back and forth, to get it to fit right.

In the end though, it finally did

20250413_170202-1024x768.jpg

And the two reasons I wanted this unit, worked

20250413_170221-1024x768.jpg

20250413_174507-1024x768.jpg

The audio quality, like in the Alto, isn't great, but the original head unit didn't sound amazing either (clear, but lacking bass), so I'm not sure if that's just normal for these. At the end of the day, I just want background music for commuting. Most of the time when driving this, I'll want to be enjoying myself and concentrating. The main function is Waze and being able to use Torque Pro.

Speaking of Torque, one function that was missing from the Alto is present on the BRZ; engine oil temp. This isn't the final layout, but good for testing.

20250418_160906-1024x768.jpg

This has to be added with a custom PID in Torque, based on instructions in this thread here and using these settings

OBD2 Mode and PID: 2101
Minimum Value: -40
Maximum Value: 215 (this is just the maximum that this location can support, which does not mean the sensor can read that high)
Scale factor: x1
Unit type: C
Equation: AC-40 (no space between A and C; "AC" is the location within the response)
OBD Header: 7E0 (Auto also works, but seems to take longer)

Seems to work well and responds as expected. I still really rate these little cheap head units. They're far from perfect, and if you're into good audio I wouldn't bother, but for the functions they offer, it's hard to beat.

One last little bit of work, while I was under the dash, was to fit my Pivot throttle controller. By some miracle, this car uses the Toyota harness, which I happened to have already since I last used this on the Yaris.

I disconnected the throttle pedal harness

20250413_123816-1024x768.jpg

and added the Pivot harness in line

20250413_123954-1024x768.jpg

I tapped into the option harness for switched power, connected the ground to a bolt, and job done.

20250413_171714-1024x768.jpg

The main reason to add this wasn't to improve throttle response, but to actually dull it down. This one does both Sport and Eco modes, and as I found out, turning it to Eco2 was enough to dull the pedal response and make the car more drivable. This was just masking an issue I would find the solution to later on.

 

  • Like 9
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

As part of my prep for the track day later this month, I wanted to replace the engine mounts. How to do it wasn't exactly clear though.

There is a bit of information out there for replacing the engine mounts, but mostly LHD and most of them say to remove the headers to do so. Being the stubborn guy I am, and not wanting to remove the headers, I thought there must've been a better way.

In my last RHDJapan order, I got a pair of uprated STI engine mounts. These have a stiffer compound rubber without being super harsh like the Cusco and similar with their polyurethane mounts.

ST41022AS000_1-1024x681.jpg

With the car in the air I slid under, removed the two under trays and had a look at what I was playing with. The mounts were surprisingly accessible.

IMG_20250608_152227-1024x766.jpg

IMG_20250608_152241-1024x766.jpg

That bolt and nut are easy to access with a rattle gun and extension, but there is also one bolt above the steering rack which is a little harder

IMG_20250608_152252.jpg

For that one I found it was best to start the bolt with an offset ring spanner as it is recessed, and then once loose, undo it with a ratcheting spanner

IMG_20250608_152521-1024x766.jpg

IMG_20250608_152531-1024x766.jpg

Both sides worked with the same treatment

IMG_20250608_152650-1024x766.jpg

To lift the engine, which has to be done otherwise the mount stud will not clear the crossmember, I used a floor jack on the sump. I'm not that happy doing this, but many people have done it before, and I used a rubber block to spread the load. I got away with doing this with no visible deformation of the pan. The hardest bit was just working around a big jack right where you need to be.

IMG_20250608_154135-1024x766.jpg

I started with the RH engine mount as I figured this would be the hardest to remove due to the steering column/rack, and I was right. I completely unbolted the RH mount and loosened the centre stud on the LH mount so that I could use that mount to pivot the engine over (instead of just lifting it straight up and having nothing keeping it in place). Once the mount was free, I could move it around, but couldn't seem to get it out. The trick was to remove the heat shield plate on the top of it (not captive like the STI mount, it just sits there) and unbolt the steering rack (mark or make note of the bolt positions before undoing them as there is some wiggle room). Without the plate on the top I had more room to move and rotate it, and lowering the rack gave me just enough room to squeeze the mount out towards the rear of the car and remove it. It'll take a fair bit of rotating and wiggling to get it out, but it's doable.

IMG_20250608_155210-1024x766.jpg

IMG_20250608_155202-1024x766.jpg

Refitting the new mount wasn't too bad either. Because the heat shield on the top of the STI mount is captive and can't be removed, I did get it stuck just as it went over the steering rack, but a little gentle pop with a pry bar got it free and into place. To bolt it in I lowered the engine slightly, so that the centre stud lined up, but I still had free movement to screw in the two bolts. Once the two bolts were done up hand tight, I lowered the engine down onto the mount, leaving the centre stud nut loose, and moved to the other side.

Comparatively, the other side was easy since there was more space to work (no exhaust or steering column)

IMG_20250608_160822-1024x766.jpg

Once the mounts are in place and the engine lowered down onto them, torque them to spec (45NM centre stud, 35NM for the two bolts, one of which has to be done to gutentight since a torque wrench won't fit - in hindsight with the rack loose you might be able to fit a torque wrench on an extension in there). The steering rack needs to be refitted and bolts torqued to 120NM.

In conclusion, yes, at least on a RHD car, you can replace the engine mounts without touching the headers.

How are the STI mounts? Good. The driveline feels tighter, more like it's part of the car. There is a small amount of extra vibration now, mostly at idle, but it's barely noticeable (and nothing like the vibration the Alto had after the rear mount inserts went in). I probably wouldn't bother replacing stock low KM mounts with them, but my 190,000km mounts were worth replacing.

Parts Used

ST41022AS000 - STI Engine Mount RH
ST41022AS010 - STI Engine Mount LH

Please note these parts are specific to my car and may vary. Please check before ordering.

 

  • Like 7
  • 1 month later...
Posted

With 190,000km on the clock, and little to no service history, I wanted to replace the PCV Valve as preventative maintenance, as this is the cause of a few issues others have had.

The main issues people seem to have with them as they age is that they can get stuck, causing oil consumption, or more commonly, a rough idle.

As far as I am aware, my car uses no oil, doesn't smoke and my idle is about as smooth as you expect for a boxer with uprated engine mounts, but it was cheap enough to buy a new one with my last shipment from Japan.

The little guy lives here, tucked down behind the inlet manifold

IMG_20250607_135911-copy-1024x768.jpg

There is a bracket with a hose on it just above it that blocks access. Remove the 10mm and move that out of the way

IMG_20250607_141415-1024x768.jpg

IMG_20250607_140125-1024x768.jpg

Much easier to see now, and slightly easier to access. I had heard the hose can get a bit hard and brittle as it ages, so I grabbed a new one of those too. It has no clamps on either end, and is just a press fit. On the manifold end, remove the little beauty cover, and then it's the hose without the clamp

IMG_20250607_141314-1024x768.jpg

Pull the hose off the inlet manifold and then the valve. It'll be on there tight. Worst case, cut it off, since we're replacing it anyway.

You'll need a deep socket, 19mm IIRC, a wobbly joint and an extension. Even then access is super tight

IMG_20250607_140429-1024x768.jpg

Once removed, it was obvious the old one hadn't been touched in a while, so it was probably original. When shaken the original one did click, but it was sticky compared to the replacement which rattled freely (there is a little valve inside it that moves freely when shaken, hence the rattling). I probably could've cleaned the original one, and it would've gone again, but for the cost, it was easier to replace it

IMG_20250607_140716-1024x768.jpg

IMG_20250607_140727-1024x768.jpg

I screwed the new one in with some sealant on the threads and tightened until snug

IMG_20250607_141129-1024x768.jpg

The new hose slipped on nicely

IMG_20250607_141311-1024x768.jpg

Plug the new hose into the manifold, refit the hose and bracket moved earlier, refit the beauty cover, and that's a job done.

No real obvious changes, maybe the idle is a little smoother, but I'm happy knowing it's been done.

Parts Used

11810AA131 - PCV Valve
99081AA321 - Hose

Please note these parts are specific to my car and may vary. Please check before ordering.

  • Like 7
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Before the first track day in the BRZ, I needed to give the brakes a going over so I knew they would withstand the beating I was about to give them.

I had no idea what the history of the braking system was, what fluid was in it and how old it was, what pads were fitted and how good they were, so I chose to renew the fluid, and replace all the pads just as a matter of course.

Typically, in what should've been a nice, easy job, it started badly. With the car in the air, I removed the rear wheels without issue, but when I got to the front, it became apparent that whoever I trusted to put the wheels on after fitting the new rubber had spun the nuts on with one too many ugga duggas. The RH wheel come off with some of my own ugga duggas, but the left was putting up a real fight.

One nut was stuck, about halfway down the stud. After bashing on it with my rattle gun and getting nowhere, I enlisted the help of my wife to stand on the brakes, whilst with my longest breaker bar I leaned on it until this happened.

IMG_20250607_165108-1024x768.jpg

IMG_20250607_165320-1024x768.jpg

The best result, really. A snapped stud at least allows me to remove the wheel.

After some running around, I found a lone wheel stud at the local Repco. I would've liked to replace one on the RH side too, which I had to clean the thread up on, but stocks were limited.

Thankfully, the front studs are real easy to replace on the Toybaru. I removed the calliper and bracket, and using my handy dandy rotor removal bolt, I removed the rotor

IMG_20250607_170459-1024x768.jpg

This left me with a bare hub, and a bit of broken stud

IMG_20250607_170553-1024x768.jpg

Two whacks of my trusty mini-sledgehammer and the remains popped right out

IMG_20250607_170650-1024x768.jpg

IMG_20250607_170716-1024x768.jpg

I slid the replacement stud through the hole in the hub and using an oversized nut as a spacer, and spare wheel nut, I wound the new stud in

IMG_20250608_135912-1024x766.jpg

IMG_20250608_140011-1024x766.jpg

IMG_20250608_140101-1024x766.jpg

With that disaster out of the way, I moved onto replacing the rear pads. The old pads looked fairly worn

IMG_20250607_175859-1024x768.jpg

Flipping the calliper up, the pads were about half worn

IMG_20250607_180252-1024x768.jpg

This S hook I got off Aliexpress a while ago is super handy

IMG_20250607_180256-1024x768.jpg

Because the new pads are thicker, the piston needs to be pushed back. A clamp was used to push the piston back, whilst the bleeder valve was open and hooked up to the bleeder bottle (to relieve pressure and not force fluid back towards the master cylinder)

IMG_20250607_181800-1024x768.jpg

IMG_20250608_130408-1024x766.jpg

Before fitting the replacement pads, I cleaned up the pad hardware. The little metal clips the pads slide on were caked in brake dust

IMG_20250608_124849-1024x768.jpg

IMG_20250608_125050-1024x768.jpg

I scrubbed them with brake cleaner and a toothbrush

IMG_20250608_125404-1024x768.jpg

They then got refitted to the calliper brackets with some of the brake paste the pads came with

IMG_20250608_125519-1024x768.jpg

The new pads then get slipped into place, with some more paste on the contact areas

IMG_20250608_130014-1024x766.jpg

IMG_20250608_130027-1024x766.jpg

The calliper was then refitted, and all bolts torqued to spec

IMG_20250608_130724-1024x766.jpg

IMG_20250607_182114-1024x768.jpg

Moving to the front, it's basically the same thing. Undo the slider bolts, remove the bottom one and swing the calliper up and secure it

IMG_20250608_132050-1024x766.jpg

IMG_20250608_132220-1024x766.jpg

The front pads looked fairly new, so I suspect they were probably replaced during compliance

IMG_20250608_132226-1024x766.jpg

I removed the pads, cleaned up the hardware and used the fancy Dixcel grease that came with the pads

IMG_20250608_133500-1024x766.jpg

And the new pads get slipped into place

IMG_20250608_134029-1024x766.jpg

It's interesting to note the Dixcel pads have this little spring thing on each pad, I'm guessing to help keep the pad off the rotor when not in use?

IMG_20250608_134034-1024x766.jpg

Push the pistons back again, flip the calliper down, torque the bolts and away you go.

The last thing I wanted to do was replace the brake fluid, once again, with Castrol React Performance Dot 4 fluid I used in the Alto. This was straightforward, I pumped about half a litre through, starting with the rears and then moving to the fronts until the new clear fluid came through. Once new fluid was flowing through each calliper, I bled each corner.

The fluid proved good (as expected), I had no issues on the track with it, but I cannot recommend the Dixcel pads I used on the front, they cannot withstand track use. More on this in my next post.

As a side note, anyone following along with the Marina, yes it's been a while since the last update, but things have been happening on that too. Hopefully have a post on that soon too.

Parts Used

Dixcel ES-361055 - Front Brake Pads (not recommended)
RDA Phantom Ceramic RDC2092 - Rear Brake Pads
Nice S453 - Front Wheel Stud

Please note these parts are specific to my car and may vary. Please check before ordering.

  • Like 8
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

If you're going Endless, I would defo chat to Mike at Prosport regarding compound selection. He's a total whizz on these matters and has never set me crook.

The midrange thing can be fixed with a flash tune I understand. I spent a lot of time researching these things and ultimately decided the Integra was better, and I already had it.

  • Like 2
Posted

I did a job on a 86 that had a NA k24 swapped into it, that was an awesome car, enough power to be fun but not try to kill you, great handling, not heavy, sounded good, it seemed to me as how they should have been made from the start

  • Like 4
Posted
7 hours ago, Snoozin said:

If you're going Endless, I would defo chat to Mike at Prosport regarding compound selection. He's a total whizz on these matters and has never set me crook.

The midrange thing can be fixed with a flash tune I understand. I spent a lot of time researching these things and ultimately decided the Integra was better, and I already had it.

I went with the MX72 Plus as this is what a few others use in their tracked (but not raced) Toybarus, and they were a sharp price out of RHD. Im not a particularly fast driver, so im surprised I outdrove the Dixcels TBH.

Regarding the torque dip, I believe the majority of the issue is the header design/cat, so replacing that fixes most of it, but its recommended to run a tune with new headers. A tune alone might help, but wont fix it. I would buy another DC2R in a heartbeat, if i could afford one :( 

7 hours ago, cletus said:

I did a job on a 86 that had a NA k24 swapped into it, that was an awesome car, enough power to be fun but not try to kill you, great handling, not heavy, sounded good, it seemed to me as how they should have been made from the start

I think they should've released a small, low boost turbo. Not really for power, but more for that shove in the back feeling to make it more exciting. As it is the engine just feels lifeless. A K24 would be awesome and a good match to the chassis, but i do quite like the whole boxer thing.

  • Like 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...