RUNAMUCK Posted January 19 Posted January 19 Very little redeeming features then. Slow, thirsty, and no fruit? Quote
igor Posted January 19 Posted January 19 Yep, all of the gas hogging and no overdrive on the auto. It wasn't terrible as a family wagon though. Quote
h4nd Posted January 27 Posted January 27 Anyone know if these dots speak tensile? (From my split rims). I can only find refs like these Thanks brains Quote
HighLUX Posted February 4 Posted February 4 J160 gearbox tutuing Has anyone done the mod with the remote shifter to move it forward a bit? @Roman? Quote
HighLUX Posted February 4 Posted February 4 And is the gearbox output spline the same as a W series gearbag? Quote
Roman Posted February 4 Author Posted February 4 Yep same as w box. There are two positions on the factory box for the shifter, easy to flip it to use the front set of holes. Otherwise sq engineering etc sell kits tbat move it way forward. 1 Quote
Dudley Posted February 5 Posted February 5 5 hours ago, HighLUX said: J160 gearbox tutuing Has anyone done the mod with the remote shifter to move it forward a bit? @Roman? @kpr and @_Matt projec threads have them doing this mod Quote
HighLUX Posted February 5 Posted February 5 Just got the gearbox and being a 1G box it already has the shifter in the forward position Guess I just offer it up to the tunnel now and see how far back it is compared to the hole for the gear stick Quote
kpr Posted February 5 Posted February 5 I hear the sq one doesn't feel amazing. as it turns it into a short shifter as well. Quote
SOHC Posted February 7 Posted February 7 I found if you run slightly too much ignition advance it makes the engine carbon up a bit , knock back the timing and it burns really clean. Quote
kws Posted Thursday at 06:29 Posted Thursday at 06:29 Anyone got experience in building engines and balancing rod weights? Due to production changes the new rod for the Alto started at 9g heavier than the old ones. Using my balance jig I have removed about 4g off the big end which is within about 1.2g of the lightest rod, the problem is now that I need to take another 5g off the little end of the rod. There's no material to remove there, but one of the production changes was to add raised bosses in the middle of the rod with the text on it instead of being flat. Is it safe for me to take a die grinder to that raised area in the middle and try to shave it down flat (or as close as needed to get the weight within spec)? I want the rods within a gram or two of each other since the engine will regularly see about 9000rpm. Quote
kpr Posted Thursday at 09:16 Posted Thursday at 09:16 yep, thats where i would be taking it off 1 1 Quote
kws Posted Thursday at 09:26 Posted Thursday at 09:26 9 minutes ago, kpr said: yep, thats where i would be taking it off I suppose the other question is, is it worth pissing around or should i just send it as it is now? The difference is something like 1.2% of the total weight of a rod... Quote
chris r Posted Thursday at 17:23 Posted Thursday at 17:23 7 hours ago, kws said: I suppose the other question is, is it worth pissing around or should i just send it as it is now? The difference is something like 1.2% of the total weight of a rod... I think it is worth the pissing around 3 Quote
kpr Posted Friday at 07:43 Posted Friday at 07:43 22 hours ago, kws said: I suppose the other question is, is it worth pissing around or should i just send it as it is now? The difference is something like 1.2% of the total weight of a rod... Yeah 5g is worth a zing. if spinning it up to 9k 1 Quote
kws Posted Saturday at 03:02 Posted Saturday at 03:02 19 hours ago, kpr said: Yeah 5g is worth a zing. if spinning it up to 9k I did it, took all the casting lines off the edges and zipped down the text a bit. Its now the same as rod 2, and 1.74g heavier than rod 1. Good enough. 2 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.