gibbon Posted April 27 Posted April 27 I have a fast-reacting IAT probe here which I was going to replace the stock item on the rx7 with. Only problem is that it doesn't have a part number or anything on it (I thought it was Aeroflow brand but it doesn't seem to match their product visually). I understand that some of these probes are polarity sensitive, how do I work out if this one is, and if so, which pin is which? Quote
Rookie Posted April 27 Posted April 27 1 hour ago, gibbon said: I have a fast-reacting IAT probe here which I was going to replace the stock item on the rx7 with. Only problem is that it doesn't have a part number or anything on it (I thought it was Aeroflow brand but it doesn't seem to match their product visually). I understand that some of these probes are polarity sensitive, how do I work out if this one is, and if so, which pin is which? If it is 2 wire then without a doub it is a NTC sensor, so it is just a variable resistor, there is no polarity so no worries there, the calibration might be a different thing though, easy enough to figure out with an accurate thermometer and a decient ECU, just see what the analog voltage is at room temp, and then again at 100 °c and then a couple more points in between, it wont be linear. It should look something like the data for this bosch one. https://www.bosch-motorsport.com/content/downloads/Raceparts/Resources/pdf/Data Sheet_70129803_Temperature_Sensor_NTC_M12-L.pdf 1 Quote
kpr Posted April 27 Posted April 27 as above polarity doesn't matter. wire to a an-temp and sensor ground. link has plenty of calibrations in drop down menu that covers most of them. main thing with iat sensors is to mount them somewhere to minimize heat soak. a sensor that reads incorrect due to heat soak is worse than none at all. Quote
gibbon Posted April 27 Posted April 27 7 hours ago, kpr said: as above polarity doesn't matter. wire to a an-temp and sensor ground. link has plenty of calibrations in drop down menu that covers most of them. main thing with iat sensors is to mount them somewhere to minimize heat soak. a sensor that reads incorrect due to heat soak is worse than none at all. ok. I was going to wire it to the original IAT harness as it's already there. presumably the calibration can be changed afterwards in the menu (come to think of it, considering I don't have a p/n for it I guess I'd better get some readings off it first) Stock position is on the underside of the manifold which seems like a terrible place as far as heatsoak is concerned, I'll move it to the plastic pre-throttle body pipe I'll take your guy's word for it that it's non polarity sensitive, but I did see a two wire aeroflow one that was, admittedly it didn't look too much like this one Quote
kpr Posted April 28 Posted April 28 Yep if the stock one is 2 wire, using same cables are fine as they will already be wired to said inputs. Can compare against the water temp sensor reading, when the car/engine is at ambient temp. to double check the calibration. 1 Quote
ajg193 Posted April 29 Posted April 29 On 28/04/2026 at 06:21, gibbon said: ok. I was going to wire it to the original IAT harness as it's already there. presumably the calibration can be changed afterwards in the menu (come to think of it, considering I don't have a p/n for it I guess I'd better get some readings off it first) Stock position is on the underside of the manifold which seems like a terrible place as far as heatsoak is concerned, I'll move it to the plastic pre-throttle body pipe I'll take your guy's word for it that it's non polarity sensitive, but I did see a two wire aeroflow one that was, admittedly it didn't look too much like this one Position is critical, if you have it pre-throttlebody you will need to compensate with a lot of awkward blending with coolant temperature to estimate temperature of the air actually getting into cylinder. General consensus (except by toyota) seems to be that you want the sensor as close to the cylinder head as possible Quote
kpr Posted May 1 Posted May 1 he will have a hard time getting it close to the cylinder head on a rotary. But anyway, I'd rather have a sensor that reads falsely low than high. Especially if running in a modeled fuel equation, that does fuel trims in the background. If iat reads low, engine runs a little bit richer. if reads high will pull too much fuel and run lean. No iat fuel correction, engine runs richer when inlet temps are hot. leaner when cold. Not ideal, but better than the other way around 5 Quote
bigfoot Posted August 29 Posted August 29 I am in the process of building a new trigger system for my lancer in the hunt for more firewall clearance, I have a balance shaft pulley that is 32 tooth. Will this work as a crank trigger wheel for my link? All the $$$ aftermarket ones seem to be 12 or 36 tooth Quote
kpr Posted September 2 Posted September 2 if i recall correct, the tooth count has to divide evenly into 360, so 32 wont work Quote
R3spct Posted September 18 Posted September 18 https://krispygauge.com/ Picked one of these up last week to run on the Haltech, cheaper and far better functionality than the shit one Haltech does. Canbus rather than OBD2 so also updates faster. Also is developing other sizes. Super easy to configure using wifi. Being Canbus it should work on anything modern with canbus too, so not limited, but a little more DIY as it doesnt just plug into the OBD plug. The guy that invented them lives in Titirangi and has a sweet OG beetle with efi and such, told him to join up here and attend OS Drags too. 7 Quote
Bearded Baldy Posted Monday at 03:42 Posted Monday at 03:42 Hey smart fellows. I have a 36- crank wheel and a cam sensor, to replace the dirty dizzy. What ecu options are out there that will sort out ignition only? Feeling like i can make 6 individual coils fit nicer than a waste spark 6 pack. Quote
kpr Posted Monday at 04:20 Posted Monday at 04:20 From memory ignition only ecu's were never really that much cheaper than a normal aftermarket ecu. can pick up an old g3 link's for pretty cheap these days. can configure the trigger inputs on them to your setup. they only have 4 ign drives. but you can pair up individual coils and run as wasted spark. spending more will obviously get you something later / some more ign drives 1 Quote
Bearded Baldy Posted Monday at 05:05 Posted Monday at 05:05 The price difference isn't really a factor, and lets be honest, if it means that later on i could switch to injection aswell then that is easier to 'prepay' now, than start a whole new expense list later. Quote
kws Posted Monday at 07:24 Posted Monday at 07:24 Depends how much you want to play with it. RusEFI are getting pretty darn good for the money these days, but isnt quite as refined as a Link. I like Speeduino and it'd do what you want, but im not sure how it compares to Rusefi now, as the rest of the features were a bit lackluster. Quote
kpr Posted Monday at 07:49 Posted Monday at 07:49 2 hours ago, Bearded Baldy said: The price difference isn't really a factor, and lets be honest, if it means that later on i could switch to injection aswell then that is easier to 'prepay' now, than start a whole new expense list later. yep full ecu will be the way to go then. basically comes down to budget, how many features and how finished it is. the latter being the diy stuff like ms, speedunio etc. most modern stuff will run most trigger setups. again the diy stuff can be picky and experimental in that area. if want something that just works go with brand name stuff. 1 Quote
Bearded Baldy Posted Monday at 07:51 Posted Monday at 07:51 Sweet, i was looking at megajolt, but if i decide to go injection then it pretty much is dead money. Time to keep my eye out for 2nd hand ecu to test the idea with. Not like i dont have more important things like rust to remove or anything haha. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.