Jump to content

Rhyscar's Toyota Levin - ‘fab it all from scratch’ project


Rhyscar

Recommended Posts

In my experience a lightweight well handling na 4 cylinder the handling and braking plus how well the gearbox will shift & decent driver will trump whatever peak power people talk about on the internet. 

 

I do however suspect it will go hard for what it is, plus will make doort noises, and it's clear to see you have considered a 2zz.

So ticks all those boxes.

 

My honda wouldn't even go under a 14 flat 1/4 mile but is capable of competing closely with some pretty modified turbo awd race cars. 

/ skid pics aren't loading?

  • Like 6
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 302
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

1 hour ago, mjrstar said:

/ skid pics aren't loading?


Yeah agree 100% it’ll be fun and fast no matter what power it makes. I’m most interested in the result because most people on the internet with 2zz’s are celica/mr2 or lotus weirdos who pay the money rather than engineering things properly themselves. I haven’t seen any properly impressive NA builds or power for that matter. 

 

Skids are a while away still.. but I do have an excess of shitty 17” goodrides in my tyre stash :-D

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I forgot about this, but ages ago I helped a mate wire a link into a 2ZZ runx rally car. 
So from memory this was completely standard mechanically, apart from ECU install.
So still that super grotty exhaust manifold and so on. So made pretty sweet power considering.
Based on this powerband looks like it should keep going for another 1000rpm, guess they were playing it safe. 
But was easy to tune out the dip from the factory lift being set at a stupid RPM to feel more VTEC-ey.

image.png.c02c5f0d4d972f5efa7b1dc39257918d.png

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah wow that’s a super flat power delivery when you get vvt working. And the high rpm dip is most definitely the yuck exhaust manifold situation. Will be interesting to see how it goes above 8000!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Rhyscar said:

Does anyone have any good guidelines for engine run-in? Engine has been sitting for 11-12yrs. Has fresh bearings (didn't touch crank), valves (oversized) and Headgasket but from memory we didn't touch the rings and we left the factory liner alone.

You've dropped the oil already, so fresh filter and oil, then just drive it (maybe take it easy the first few 100km)

Id probably run some higher zinc oil as that will help with lubrication, wont hurt anything and should help with reducing wear/friction

How clean is the motor? if the motor has some buildup you could run some higher detergent oil to help clean it out

Main reason for breaking in an engine are for rings to seal and not bearings

Probably do an earlier oil change just to make sure everything looks ok

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd say if you haven't done rings then it's ready for full send I reckon.

On a side note a mate of mine has a b16a racecar he wanted higher compression so put some second hand pistons in it, inspected the rings and bores and decided the 250,000 km original rings were still good to go.

So no need to bed rings, and can get straight into swinging the engine to 9200 rpm again.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cool thanks @shrike and @mjrstar , consensus is it's good to go. I found a 5w-30 Penrite mineral oil that I'm running it on currently. A little unsure what spec to go with next, may just default to Motul 300v because it literally works with everything racecar related. 

Although I'd be interested in what oil the TRS cars ran in these engines? Surely a Castrol being toyota?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It sounds great man! I can't wait to hear it at full song. 

Here's some info about engine break-in. There's also a break-in module in the engine building courses on HPA that I know you have access to :) . 

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

 

So I'm no @Roman or @kpr and I know you've already fiddled with your inlet manifold, but now that Dave has proven we can 3d print metal easily and cheaply enough, could you do a curved runner behind the throttle body that lowers the throttle a little to get a nice entry angle?

Would this leave you with atomised fuel pelting into the runner wall, or will the airflow suck the fuel round the corner? 

I've been playing with the sheet metal tool in Fusion and thoroughly enjoyed it. Could be a good next move after cardboard and then order a cut and folded box? 

Could you do silicone connectors between the throttles and the airbox to reduce the effect of vibration and put the bell mouths in the back wall of the box?

Old mate in Kaiwaka with the widebody GTR fronted Stagea has been doing 3D printed modular moulds and producing composite parts off them (OMG just posted my first spoiler and it worked)

 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have successfully used cardboard and tape as a mould to make a fiberglass component..

 

I'd probably make the airbox in 2 halves maybe making the bottom half that you have already in cardboard out of a thin sheet of wood (or the aluminum you already have) and have it clip or screw together. 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, GARDRB said:

 

So I'm no @Roman or @kpr and I know you've already fiddled with your inlet manifold, but now that Dave has proven we can 3d print metal easily and cheaply enough, could you do a curved runner behind the throttle body that lowers the throttle a little to get a nice entry angle?

Would this leave you with atomised fuel pelting into the runner wall, or will the airflow suck the fuel round the corner? 

I've been playing with the sheet metal tool in Fusion and thoroughly enjoyed it. Could be a good next move after cardboard and then order a cut and folded box? 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Yeah change to the intake manifold is possible. I'm actually working on an updated manifold design that's curved atm but it's roughly 20-25mm longer after the throttle. But ultimately looking to sell that for profit/pay for stuff, not put on this car as I think I can make what I've got work. Also a shorter manifold is better - intake length before throttle rather than after is better (in terms of air path).

Yup I use Solidworks sheetmetal but I tend to find its easier/quicker to just cut and fold stuff unless it's super complex. Means you can double check and make adjustments as you go and end up with a better result than laser cutting & realising something isn't right. 

 

2 hours ago, GARDRB said:

 

Could you do silicone connectors between the throttles and the airbox to reduce the effect of vibration and put the bell mouths in the back wall of the box?

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Yeah I get what you mean, this could work OK but then airbox would need more support. I don't think I can get rid of vibration, just a matter of choosing materials that don't hate it like Ali (particularly once welded!!). The whole car vibrates when it's running.. 

 

 

2 hours ago, GARDRB said:


Old mate in Kaiwaka with the widebody GTR fronted Stagea has been doing 3D printed modular moulds and producing composite parts off them (OMG just posted my first spoiler and it worked)

  Reveal hidden contents

Making molds is a great use of 3D printing but creates an extra step. If there isn't a production run of parts, @Roman has proved one-off 3D printing and overlaying in carbon is a very time effective process. Perhaps not as nice finish as a molded based CF part, but I think it will suit my purposes just fine. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mjrstar said:

I have successfully used cardboard and tape as a mould to make a fiberglass component..

 

I'd probably make the airbox in 2 halves maybe making the bottom half that you have already in cardboard out of a thin sheet of wood (or the aluminum you already have) and have it clip or screw together. 

 

 

Thats impressive. Pics or it didn't happen :grin:

 

Yeah it'll be a top & bottom section at the very least, but even getting that flange to sit right after some time (and to model in Solidworks!!) can be a PITA. My experience designing plastic parts generally dictates that rounded corners and contours are your friend and flat surfaces are very hard to keep flat... 

This will be 350mm L x 600mm w x 130mm H - so unsure if this a reasonable size to be 3D printing in one piece or do I need to split it down the middle too?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Rhyscar said:

This will be 350mm L x 600mm w x 130mm H - so unsure if this a reasonable size to be 3D printing in one piece or do I need to split it down the middle too?

600mm is gonna be pretty big for most printers, but someone like PCBway might be able to do it? You could also look at SLS Nylon or something through them and have a finished part to run with?

 

https://www.pcbway.com/rapid-prototyping/3d-printing/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Rhyscar said:

 

Thats impressive. Pics or it didn't happen :grin:

Brown packing tape releases nicely, or you can just resin over stretched cloth if you have an organic shape.

The red was just whatever shiny spray can pain I had over a bit of dash, some tape and cardboard a d the secret jib stopping compound (cheap and very quick to sand)

/ dam you Spoiler.

 

 

Screenshot_20241001_160150_Gallery.jpg

Screenshot_20241001_160156_Gallery.jpg

Screenshot_20241001_160021_Gallery.jpg

Screenshot_20241001_160300_Gallery.jpg

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I look at this I'm just 100% thinking a curved manifold is going to make your life a hell of a lot easier and it's not going to impact power at all. 

Looks like you either need to cut the bonnet (yuck) or bend the manifold or this is going to be near impossible unless you've got solid mounts.

But having a gross shape at the end of the runners is way worse than having a manifold with a bend in it. 

One of my Echo manifolds had a bend in it like this and it didnt harm power what so ever, but meant I had more room for activities (running an extra fuel rail on top for nerdy purposes)

Paraphrasing KPRs experiences a bit, but generally the important parts of a manifold seem to be right at the entrance, and what happens right at the port - and the motor is quite insensitive to what ever is in the middle. 
Like one of his manifolds had a massive step in the runners (in the wrong direction) and it made 0% difference to power, which is totally counterintuitive! 


 

bend.png

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How about making it out of metal and then making a part straight off that as a mould? 

We've done a few carbon pieces at work that way. Brandon 3D modeled an interior footwell tray, got it cut and folded, welded up the corners and then laid a sheet of carbon straight over it. Job's done. You can add foam or nomex between layers for rigidity if needed.

Do that process twice to get both halves and you're sorted? 

Excuse my potato photo: 

image.thumb.png.0ba401845da167bec158db6dacfb06ff.png

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...