Jump to content

For Questions Regarding WOFs/CERTs/NUMBER PLATEs


Recommended Posts

Posted

Beauty cheers,

I will make the changes then send some photos to local cert man/have him come around and have a look before i zap it in.

Needed to know if it was a feasible idea before i started.

Wicky.

  • Replies 10k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
22 minutes ago, Bearded Baldy said:

Screenshot_20260716_185157_DuckDuckGo.thumb.jpg.8e0417bedb3652edcedd17818cfdace7.jpg

Yeah, the welds offer quite a range of integrity! What sticks out most to me is the load path from the link on the left would put the rod end on the diff in bending, using standard design logic this is really bad news although can be allowable in rare cases. 

In this situation, its not a fun time to imagine the reaction of the car to that link failing.

  • Like 1
Posted

I'm seeing the whole axle rotating with suspension movements. What's the rest of the axle attached to? 

  • Like 3
Posted
13 hours ago, Mof said:

I'm seeing the whole axle rotating with suspension movements. What's the rest of the axle attached to? 

but the Tuning Book said extreme pinion angles are good for extreme tractions

Posted
13 hours ago, Mof said:

I'm seeing the whole axle rotating with suspension movements. What's the rest of the axle attached to? 

looks land rovery

probably has an upper wishbone attached to the middle of the diff that you cant see

  • Like 1
Posted

Please what's the story with dpf delete on a newish vehicle? -You get a tune, and a test done like this:

gallery carousel 17

And if it passes you're all legal?

Posted

I am 99 percent sure i am overthinking this, but when seat mounting plates say the rivets must be as 'close to parallel to the centerline of the vehicle', it doesn't mean the rivets have to be in the center of the plate does it? Becauae all the pics in the paperwork i can find are like this...

Screenshot_20260725_152856_DuckDuckGo.thumb.jpg.7f5fb7bdfd09abc1357c503f345fb3ac.jpg

I can just put them in the corners eh? Like this.

20260725_151112_copy_1346x1009.jpg.1fcd9846e97aa5e30407608a4c0fbf8e.jpg

Orange plate being the backing plate obviously.

 

Posted

Those pictures make more sense if you are using off the shelf doubler plates. I just had top bolt to do in my car so was able to use them.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
On 20/07/2026 at 10:54, morkster said:

Please what's the story with dpf delete on a newish vehicle? -You get a tune, and a test done like this:

gallery carousel 17

And if it passes you're all legal?

This is the main reason I brought a 2010

Doesn't have dpf and first mod was new exhaust with cat delete and re map.

  • Like 2
Posted

I've clearly not had my fill of suffering in my life because I'm looking at purchasing a 1965 Land Rover Series 2a.  Been a long time since I've bought a modified vehicle so I have some q's:

It's been fitted with a Holden 186 and is on paper declaration rather than cert. Are these still valid provided that the vehicle matches the paper? Curently has WOF and reg and is on original plates. 9Is there anything that I need to look out for with declarations? As far as I'm aware NZTA have copies of some of these but not all. At this stage I don't know if the paper is the original or a photocopy, unsure if this matters.

Also, it's a 1965 model so I believe it would have had headlamps in the radiator panel from factory. It currently has headlamps in the wings per late 2a's/3's etc. I'd like to change it back to original spec, is this something that would require cert/should it be on the declaration paper? 

Posted

they are still valid

If EVERYTHING matches.

so for example if it says it had a 179 on the declaration, and now it has a 186

or it had 15x6 wheels but now it has 16x7 

then it would need to be re certified.

they are also quite vague and leave a lot of detail off, like the headlights, it is very unlikely that a declaration would have had that on there

this is just because the expectation of what should be covered by a cert has changed a huge amount over the years, even when the cert system started, the level of detail was very very different to what is expected now, this has changed even in the time ive been involved

 

also a declaration was never a statement of the vehicle being safe, it was only to prove that the mods were done prior to the rules coming in, in 1992, so the motor could be mounted with baling wire and cut up gumboots, and it could have a declaration

 

tbh modified cars seldom last this long without something getting changed so i dont see them very often that are still legitimate

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 1
Posted

@cletus thank you that's good to know! Will make sure I'm very careful to check everything matches if I do end up buying it. Assume if it doesn't match then it's either put it back to as on the declaration or just get it certified? Probably easier to just get cert and be done with it tbh though. 

What's your opinion on the headlight placement? Would you have issues if a vehicle was bought to you having had the front clip swapped? As far as I'm aware it's all a straight swap with factory components. I potentially have a couple of leads on an early series 2 front end so shouldn't be too much drama to convert back to original if I buy it.

Posted
43 minutes ago, chasinthemirage said:

@cletus thank you that's good to know! Will make sure I'm very careful to check everything matches if I do end up buying it. Assume if it doesn't match then it's either put it back to as on the declaration or just get it certified? Probably easier to just get cert and be done with it tbh though. 

What's your opinion on the headlight placement? Would you have issues if a vehicle was bought to you having had the front clip swapped? As far as I'm aware it's all a straight swap with factory components. I potentially have a couple of leads on an early series 2 front end so shouldn't be too much drama to convert back to original if I buy it.

If you are returning it to OEM spec, its not an issue at all for cert, as its technically not modified

If you were going the other way, ie early front on a later one, then we would have to apply the light standard, and check that it complies with light positioning /angles of visibility etc 

  • Thanks 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...