Jump to content

Not-a-number

Members
  • Posts

    236
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

Posts posted by Not-a-number

  1. 1 hour ago, 00quattro00 said:

    Whats wrong with using 350 as opposed to 250?

    Nothing, just that it will be harder to do by hand.

     

    6 minutes ago, anglia4 said:

    Its higher tensile material. Nominally 350MPa yield strength as opposed to 250MPa.

    To form it over the mandrel you need to be able to "yield" it, so the higher tensile would need more force to bend to yield.

    @Not-a-number will you be heating it to form?

    Hopefully not but probably. Ive heard if it was G350 that would  probably crack and distort it. Since it would be locally annealing.

  2. 5 hours ago, BlownCorona said:

    shit that's going to be a large motor!

    i had in my head that those parts were the profile of the crankcase and that part housed the crank gear like a standard engine would have a timing gear case on the front of the block

    Yeah its pretty big.

    Banana for scale. 

    Cepva6Jl.jpg

    Also mm for scale. Its about 1020mm long.

    HOb2DYyl.jpg

    About 700mm tall

    zMgyyOal.jpg

    • Like 6
    • Thanks 2
  3. So the only issue was the back face.

    It looks like a crack. But what I think happened is the tapered 'disk' type chill blocks have no where to expand to. They are also in really thin sand. So when the chill block started doing its thing and getting hot it expanded, cracking the sand and pushing it into the face that hadnt solidified.

    The front did the same looking at the sand mould after the pour but it wasnt on a flat face so it didnt matter.

    May look at changing it to more of a boss like the others.

    XZU4S6U.jpg

    • Like 1
    • Confused 1
    • Sad 4
  4. 1 hour ago, sheepers said:

    Yea the old "suck it and see" method of production improvement,  60% of the time it works every time.

    And yes you'd be hard pressed to find a foundry they you could just walk up to the door and get your mould poured straight away. 

     

    Definitely open to some advice on the big stuff if you want to help?

    Im getting a better understanding of the runner system but on the big stuff like the crankcase theres so much going on (and its so big I dont want to mess it up too many times)

  5. 29 minutes ago, sheepers said:

    excellent news on the good casting result.

    have made many patterns and tried to get castings to work in various sizes and levels of complexity before and i know how hard/frustrating it can be so great work man.

    the foundry you're using look like they know their shit too which always helps. 

    They know what theyre doing so that does help. Usually the answer is "you could change X Y and Z and that might help, or it might make it worse you just gotta try it." :grin:

    One of the awesome things with the foundries over here is they are pouring 24/7. I just drive up and take the mould right to the furnace and fill it up straight away! NZ wasnt quite like that!

    • Like 2
  6. 13 hours ago, Matt G said:

    Apologies  if youve been already asked but, is it not economic to just 3D print the metal parts?

    so much time making those molds i bet.

    Possibly on some smaller parts like the supercharger or waterpump. Maaaaybe!

    I dont know the cost of Aluminium printing now but when I was doing SS printing it was about $1000/kg.

    The sump/crankcase are around 20-30kg and would have to be done in multiple pieces and welded together.

    This camtree part is 5kg and cost $100 to pour. Means once its right they are super cheap.

    A rough estimate on the cost to do this part:

    • Modeling and pattern design - 250hrs
    • Pattern Printing - $50 material
    • Pattern /corebox prep - 50hrs & $100 material
    • Sand Mould making - 15hrs
    • Sand Mould cost - $20
    • Pour part - $100

    So total its taken about 300hrs and $200 to make 1.

     

     

     

     

     

    • Like 4
    • Thanks 2
×
×
  • Create New...